Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMaria Tsirogianni, Androniki
dc.contributor.authorBouzalmate Hajjaj, Amira
dc.contributor.authorvan ’t Hooft, Janneke
dc.contributor.authorSaeed Khan, Khalid 
dc.contributor.authorBueno Cavanillas, Aurora 
dc.contributor.authorCano Ibáñez, Naomi 
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T10:00:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T10:00:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-06
dc.identifier.citationMaria Tsirogianni, A. et. al. 63 (2024) 936e943. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.08.026]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/95067
dc.description.abstractBackground: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) widely considered the gold standard for evidencebased healthcare may be limited in their clinical usefulness in lifestyle interventions for adults with overweight, obesity, or metabolic syndrome. Objective: In this systematic review of lifestyle intervention RCTs we delineated trial usefulness. Methods: Following prospective registration in PROSPERO (CRD4202347896), we conducted a comprehensive search across Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, covering the period from inception to December 2023. RCTs involving dietary interventions, with or without physical activity, and with or without behavioural support were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction. Study usefulness was assessed using a multidimensional 14 item questionnaire. Percentage compliance with usefulness items was computed. Results: Of 1175 records, 30 RCTs (12,841 participants) were included. Among these, 13 (43%) RCTs complied with half of the usefulness items and only 3 (10%) complied with two-thirds of the items. For each usefulness item individually: 30 (100%) reported the burden of the problem addressed, 15 (50%) contextualized the trial through a systematic review, 18 (60%) presented an informative trial with clinically meaningful outcomes evaluated at a stated statistical power, 17 (57%) had low risk of bias, 2 (7%) exhibited pragmatic features pertaining to the trial methodologies and outcomes relevant to real-world application.18 (60%) were patient centred with formal patient involvement, none (0%) demonstrated value for money, 17 (57%) were completed according to their feasibility assessment achieving at least 90% of the estimated sample size, and 30 (100%) reported at least one of five transparency or openness features. Conclusion: Only one in 10 lifestyle RCTs met two-thirds of the usefulness features. It is imperative to meet these criteria when devising future trials within the field of nutrition to reduce research waste.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Granada / CBUAes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectUsefulnesses_ES
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trialses_ES
dc.subjectLifestyle es_ES
dc.titleThe usefulness of randomized trials of lifestyle interventions for overweight, obesity, or metabolic syndrome: A systematic reviewes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.08.026
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional