Irruption of Network Analysis to Explain Dietary, Psychological and Nutritional Patterns and Metabolic Health Status in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Overweight and Obese University Students: Ecuadorian Case
Metadata
Show full item recordEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Gaussian graphic model Exploratory analysis Dietary nutritional patterns
Date
2024-09-01Referencia bibliográfica
Aguirre-Quezada, M.A.; Aranda-Ramírez, M.P. Irruption of Network Analysis to Explain Dietary, Psychological and Nutritional Patterns and Metabolic Health Status in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Overweight and Obese University Students: Ecuadorian Case. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172924
Abstract
Background. The association between dietary nutritional patterns, psychological factors,
and metabolic health status has not been investigated in university students. There are studies that
include numerous variables to test hypotheses from various theoretical bases, but due to their complexity,
they have not been studied in combination. The scientific community recognizes the use of
Gaussian graphical models (GGM) as a set of novel methods capable of addressing this. Objective. To
apply GGMs to derive specific networks for groups of healthy and unhealthy obese individuals that
represent nutritional, psychological, and metabolic patterns in an Ecuadorian population. Methodology.
This was a quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, correlational study conducted
on a sample of 230 obese/overweight university students, selected through a multi-stage random
sampling method. To assess usual dietary intake, a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) was used;
to evaluate psychological profiles (anxiety, depression, and stress), the DASS-21 scale was employed;
blood pressure and anthropometric data were collected; and insulin levels, lipid profiles, and glucose
levels were determined using fasting blood samples. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF)
criteria were applied to identify metabolically healthy and unhealthy individuals. Statistical analysis
relied on univariate methods (frequencies, measures of central tendency, and dispersion), and the
relationships were analyzed through networks. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze
differences between groups. Results. In metabolically unhealthy obese individuals, GGMs identified
a primary network consisting of the influence of waist circumference on blood pressure and insulin
levels. In the healthy obese group, a different network was identified, incorporating stress and
anxiety variables that influenced blood pressure, anthropometry, and insulin levels. Other identified
networks show the dynamics of obesity and the effect of waist circumference on triglycerides, anxiety,
and riboflavin intake. Conclusions. GGMs are an exploratory method that can be used to construct
networks that illustrate the behavior of obesity in the studied population. In the future, the identified
networks could form the basis for updating obesity management protocols in Primary Care Units
and supporting clinical interventions in Ecuador.