Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMontero Vílchez, Trinidad
dc.contributor.authorMartínez López, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCuenca Barrales, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorQuiñones Vico, María Isabel 
dc.contributor.authorSierra Sánchez, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorMolina Leyva, Alejandro 
dc.contributor.authorGonçalo, Margarida
dc.contributor.authorCambil Martín, Jacobo 
dc.contributor.authorArias Santiago, Salvador Antonio 
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T09:48:42Z
dc.date.available2024-09-09T09:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMontero-Vilchez T, Martinez-Lopez A, Cuenca-Barrales C, Quiñones-Vico MI, Sierra-Sanchez A, Molina-Leyva A, Gonçalo M, Cambil-Martin J, Arias-Santiago S. Assessment of hand hygiene strategies on skin barrier function during COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial. Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Apr;86(4):276-285. doi: 10.1111/cod.14034. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PMID: 34954837.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/94174
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has increased the frequency of handwashing. There is scarce evidence regarding the impact of different hand hygiene procedures on skin barrier function in clinical practice. Objective: To compare the impact on skin barrier function of different hand hygiene measures in healthcare workers in daily practice. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Participants were randomized to sanitize their hands with water and soap, alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHSs), or disinfectant wipes during their 8-hour working shift. Epidermal barrier functional parameters, such as transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and the microbial load were assessed before and immediately after the working day. Tolerance and acceptability of each product were recorded after work. Results: Sixty-two participants were included and 20, 21, and 21 were randomized to use water and soap, ABHS, and disinfectant wipes, respectively. After the 8-hour shift, TEWL increase was higher with disinfectant wipes than with soaps or ABHS (+5.45 vs +3.87 vs -1.46 g h-1 m-2 , respectively; P = .023). Bacteria and fungi colony-forming unit (CFU) count reductions were lower for the water and soap group than for ABHS and disinfectant wipes. Disinfectant wipes were considered more difficult to use (P = .013) compared with water and soap and ABHS. Conclusion: Daily hand hygiene with ABHS showed the lowest rates of skin barrier disruption and the highest reduction of CFU.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_ES
dc.subjectHand disinfectiones_ES
dc.subjectHand Hygienees_ES
dc.subjectHand sanitizerses_ES
dc.subjectSkin barrieres_ES
dc.titleAssessment of hand hygiene strategies on skin barrier function during COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.14034
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional