Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Renau, Ester
dc.contributor.authorMartín Platero, Antonio Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorBodawatta, Kasun H.
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Vivaldi Martínez, Manuel Lorenzo 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Bueno, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorPoulsen, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSoler, Juan José
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T10:52:15Z
dc.date.available2024-09-05T10:52:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-18
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Renau, E., Martín-Platero, A.M., Bodawatta, K.H. et al. Social environment influences microbiota and potentially pathogenic bacterial communities on the skin of developing birds. anim microbiome 6, 47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-024-00327-2es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/94005
dc.description.abstractBackground Animal bacterial symbionts are established early in life, either through vertical transmission and/ or by horizontal transmission from both the physical and the social environment, such as direct contact with conor heterospecifics. The social environment particularly can influence the acquisition of both mutualistic and pathogenic bacteria, with consequences for the stability of symbiotic communities. However, segregating the effects of the shared physical environment from those of the social interactions is challenging, limiting our current knowledge on the role of the social environment in structuring bacterial communities in wild animals. Here, we take advantage of the avian brood-parasite system of Eurasian magpies (Pica pica) and great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) to explore how the interspecific social environment (magpie nestlings developing with or without heterospecifics) affects bacterial communities on uropygial gland skin. Results We demonstrated interspecific differences in bacterial community compositions in members of the two species when growing up in monospecific nests. However, the bacterial community of magpies in heterospecific nests was richer, more diverse, and more similar to their cuckoo nest-mates than when growing up in monospecific nests. These patterns were alike for the subset of microbes that could be considered core, but when looking at the subset of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera, cuckoo presence reduced the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacterial genera on magpies. Conclusions Our findings highlight the role of social interactions in shaping the assembly of the avian skin bacterial communities during the nestling period, as exemplified in a brood parasite—host system.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Naturees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPredoctoral contract (PRE2018-085378)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipProjects CGL2017-83103-P, PID2020-117429GB-C21, and PID2020-117429GB-C22, funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación/Agencia Estatal de Investigación/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033and by “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, a way of making Europe”es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltdes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAvian skin microbiomees_ES
dc.subjectBacterial communityes_ES
dc.subjectBrood parasitismes_ES
dc.titleSocial environment influences microbiota and potentially pathogenic bacterial communities on the skin of developing birdses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42523-024-00327-2
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional