National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Standard Descending Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Optimisation Strategies
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Del Río-Solá, Maria L.; Rial, Rodrigo; López Espada, Cristina; Rodríguez-Morata, Alejandro; Vañó, Eliseo; Spanish DRLs Vascular Collaborators GroupEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Diagnostic reference level DRL European Directive
Fecha
2024-08-05Referencia bibliográfica
Del Río Solá, M.L. et. al. 68(2):210-217. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.012]
Resumen
Objective: The International Commission on Radiological Protection has highlighted the large number of medical
specialties that use fluoroscopy outside diagnostic imaging departments without radiation protection
programmes for patients and staff. Vascular surgery is one of these specialties. Thoracic endovascular aortic
repair (TEVAR) is a complicated procedure requiring radiation protection guidance and optimisation. The
recent EU Basic Safety Standards Directive requires the use and periodic updating of diagnostic reference
levels (DRLs) for interventional procedures. The aim of this study was to determine doses for patients
undergoing TEVAR with mobile Xray systems and hybrid rooms (fixed Xray systems) to obtain national DRLs
and to suggest optimisation actions.
Methods: This was a retrospective cross sectional study. The Spanish Chapter of Endovascular Surgery conducted
a national survey in 11 autonomous communities representing around 77.6% of the Spanish population (47.33
million inhabitants). A total of 266 TEVAR procedures from 17 Spanish centres were analysed, of which 53.0%
were performed in hybrid operating rooms. National DRLs were obtained and defined as the third quartile of
the median values from the different participating centres.
Results: The proposed national DRLs are: for kerma area product (KAP), 113.81 Gy$cm2 for mobile Xray systems
and 282.59 Gy$cm2 for hybrid rooms; and for cumulative air kerma (CAK) at the patient entry reference point,
228.38 mGy for mobile systems and 910.64 mGy for hybrid rooms.
Conclusion: Based on the requirement to know radiation doses for standard endovascular procedures, this study
of TEVARs demonstrated that there is an increased factor of 2.48 in DRLs for KAP when the procedure is
performed in a hybrid room compared with mobile C-arm systems, and an increased factor of 3.98 in DRLs
for CAK when the procedure is performed with hybrid equipment. These results will help to optimise
strategies to reduce radiation doses during TEVAR procedures.