The Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a Global Positioning System for Measuring Maximum Sprinting Speed and Split Times of Linear and Curvilinear Sprint Tests
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Sašek, Matic; Miras Moreno, Sergio; García Ramos, Amador; Cvjetičanin, Oskar; Šarabon, Nejc; Kavčič, Iztok; Smajla, DarjanEditorial
MDPI
Materia
curvilinear sprint GPS reliability
Fecha
2024-07-13Referencia bibliográfica
Sašek, M. et. al. 14, 6116. [https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146116]
Patrocinador
Slovenian Research Agency under grant KINSPO–Kinesiology for the effectiveness and prevention of musculoskeletal injuries in sports (P5–0443)Resumen
This study investigated the reliability and validity of linear sprint tests (LS) and curvilinear
sprint tests (CS) using a GPS device (GPEXE lt). Twenty-one (21) student athletes completed a
40 m LS as well as a left and right CS. Maximum sprint speed (MSS) and split times at short
(0–10 m), intermediate (0–20 m), and long (0–30 m) distances were determined using the GPEXE
lt and single-beam timing gates (TG). Intrasession reliability and concurrent validity of GPEXE lt
were assessed. The GPEXE lt consistently showed high reliability for MSS (ICC ≥ 0.95; CV ≤ 1.8%),
despite underestimation compared to TG (bias = −2.57 to −0.95%; ICC ≥ 0.87). Acceptable reliability
was observed for CS and LS intermediate and long distance split times (ICC ≥ 0.91; CV ≤ 2.1%),
with lower reliability for short distances (ICC ≥ 0.70; CV ≤ 3.6%). The GPEXE lt split times for CS
and LS showed good agreement with TG (ICC ≥ 0.66), but were overestimated at long distances
(5.5–9.7%) and short distances (11.1–14.6%). Although the MSS was found to be the most reliable
and valid variable to assess LS and CS speed performance with GPEXE lt, caution is needed due to
limited validity.