Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBudden, Mitchell
dc.contributor.authorGilbertson, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorChung, Sean
dc.contributor.authorBenrimoj, Shalom I
dc.contributor.authorMardones, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorDineen Griffin, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T11:10:24Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T11:10:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-15
dc.identifier.citationBudden, M. et. al. Int J Clin Pharm (2024). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01768-0]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93712
dc.description.abstractBackground Pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections has been introduced as a service in the United Kingdom, Canada, United States of America, New Zealand, and Australia. The management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections by community pharmacists has gained increasing attention as a potential avenue to alleviate the burden on primary healthcare services. Aim The objectives of the review were to: (1) identify protocols for community pharmacist management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women aged 16–65 years; (2) outline their key components; and (3) appraise the quality of protocols. Method A grey literature search was undertaken for protocols intended for use by community pharmacists for the management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women aged 16–65 years, met the definition of a clinical management protocol and written in English. Their quality was appraised using the Appraisal Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version II instrument. Results Forty of the 274 records screened were included. Content analysis identified ten key components: common signs/ symptoms, differential diagnosis, red flags/referral, choice of empirical antibiotic therapy, nonprescription medications, nonpharmacological/self-care advice, patient eligibility criteria, patient follow-up, dipstick testing recommendations, and recommendations on antimicrobial resistance. The lowest scoring domains in the quality assessment were ‘Editorial Independence’ and ‘Rigour of Development’. Only four protocols were deemed high-quality. Conclusion The review demonstrates that clinical management protocols for pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections consist of similar recommendations, despite variation in international practice. However, the findings highlight a deficiency in the quality of most clinical management protocols governing pharmacist-led urinary tract infection management.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectClinical management protocoles_ES
dc.subjectCommunity pharmacistes_ES
dc.subjectCommunity pharmacy serviceses_ES
dc.titleClinical management protocols for community pharmacist‑led management of urinary tract infections: a review of the grey literature and quality appraisales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11096-024-01768-0
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional