Effects of Hydrotherapy on the Management of Childbirth and Its Outcomes—A Retrospective Cohort Study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Mellado García, Elena; Díaz Rodríguez, Lourdes; Cortés Martín, Jonathan; Sánchez García, Juan Carlos; Piqueras Sola, Beatriz; Higuero Macías, Juan Carlos; Rodríguez Blanque, RaquelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
hydrotherapy waterbirth immersion
Fecha
2024-05-20Referencia bibliográfica
Mellado García, E. et. al. Nurs. Rep. 2024, 14, 1251–1259. [https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020095]
Resumen
The use of hydrotherapy during childbirth has gained relevance due to the demand for
natural childbirth and greater respect for the woman’s choice. Studies have shown benefits such
as less use of epidural analgesia, increased ability to cope with pain, shorter labor, and a better
overall birth experience. Objective: The main objective of this study was to generate further evidence
on maternal and birth outcomes associated with the use of hydrotherapy during labor, specifically
aiming to describe the effects of water immersion during all stages of labor (first, second, and third)
on women. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on a random sample of
women who gave birth at the Costa del Sol Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. The
calculated sample size was 377 women and the data were extracted from their partograms. After
data extraction, two groups were formed: one group used hydrotherapy during childbirth (n = 124),
while the other group included women who did not use hydrotherapy during the childbirth process
(n = 253). Results: The results highlight significant differences in pain perception, analgesia use, types
of labor, and delivery times between the two groups. Women who did not use hydrotherapy reported
higher pain perception, with a median (IQR) of 8 (7–9) on a numerical scale, compared to a median
(IQR) of 6 (5–7) for the hydrotherapy group. Furthermore, the group without hydrotherapy required
epidural analgesia in 40% of cases, while in the hydrotherapy group, it was only necessary in 20%.
In terms of the type of delivery, the hydrotherapy group had more spontaneous vaginal deliveries
compared to the non-hydrotherapy group, which had more operative vaginal deliveries. The overall
duration of labor was longer in the hydrotherapy group, especially in women who arrived at the
hospital late in labor. Conclusions: Hydrotherapy is associated with a longer time to delivery. Women
with a higher pain tolerance tend to opt for hydrotherapy instead of epidural analgesia





