Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorLuick, Madison
dc.contributor.authorBandy, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorPiernas Sánchez, Carmen María 
dc.contributor.authorA. Jebb, Susan
dc.contributor.authorPechey, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-29T10:19:02Z
dc.date.available2024-07-29T10:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-21
dc.identifier.citationLuick, M. et. al. BMC Public Health (2024) 24:1658. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19080-x]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93559
dc.description.abstractBackground Dietary changes are necessary to improve population health and meet environmental sustainability targets. Here we analyse the impact of promotional activities implemented in UK supermarkets on purchases of healthier and more sustainable foods. Methods Three natural experiments examined the impact of promotional activities on sales of a) no-added-sugar (NAS) plant-based milk (in 199 stores), b) products promoted during ‘Veganuary’ (in 96 stores), and c) seasonal fruit (in 100 non-randomised intervention and 100 matched control stores). Data were provided on store-level product sales, in units sold and monetary value (£), aggregated weekly. Predominant socioeconomic position (SEP) of the store population was provided by the retailer. Analyses used interrupted time series and multivariable hierarchical mixedeffects models. Results Sales of both promoted and total NAS plant-based milks increased significantly during the promotional period (Promoted:+126 units, 95%CI: 105–148; Overall:+307 units, 95%CI: 264–349). The increase was greater in stores with predominately low SEP shoppers. During Veganuary, sales increased significantly for plant-based foods on promotion (+60 units, 95%CI: 37–84), but not for sales of plant-based foods overall (dairy alternatives: -1131 units, 95%CI: -5821–3559; meat alternatives: 1403 units, 95%CI: -749–3554). There was no evidence of a change in weekly sales of promoted seasonal fruit products (assessed via ratio change in units sold: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.00–0.02), and overall fruit category sales slightly decreased in intervention stores relative to control (ratio change in units sold: -0.01, 95%CI: -0.01–0.00). Conclusion During promotional campaigns there was evidence that sales of plant-based products increased, but not seasonal fruits. There was no evidence for any sustained change beyond the intervention period.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipImpact on Urban Health (grant EIC210203)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR Applied Research Collaborations Oxfordes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThames Valley. C.P. is currently funded by a grant RYC2020-028818-I, MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship“ESF Investing in your future” (Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Society and Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Dale fellowship (222566/Z/21/Z)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Health Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centrees_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherBMCes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSupermarketes_ES
dc.subjectPromotionses_ES
dc.subjectUKes_ES
dc.titleDo promotions of healthier or more sustainable foods increase sales? Findings from three natural experiments in UK supermarketses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-024-19080-x
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional