Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMauladdawilah, Husein
dc.contributor.authorGago, E.J.
dc.contributor.authorBalfaqih, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorPegalajar, M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-29T10:08:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-29T10:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-27
dc.identifier.citationMauladdawilah, H. et. al. Heliyon 10 (2024) e33419. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33419]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93538
dc.description.abstractTime series forecasting still awaits a transformative breakthrough like that happened in computer vision and natural language processing. The absence of extensive, domain-independent benchmark datasets and standardized performance measurement units poses a significant challenge for it, especially for photovoltaic forecasting applications. Additionally, since it is often time domain-driven, a plethora of highly unique and domain-specific datasets were produced. The lack of uniformity among published models, developed under diverse settings for varying forecasting horizons, and assessed using non-standardized metrics, remains a significant obstacle to the progress of the field as a whole. To address these issues, a systematic review of the state-ofthe- art literature on prediction tasks is presented, collected from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, published in 2022 and 2023, and filtered using keywords such as “photovoltaic,” “deep learning,” “forecasting,” and “time series.” Finally, 36 case studies were selected. Before comparing, a state-of-the-art demonstration of key elements in the topic was presented, such as model type, hyperparameters, and evaluation metrics. Then, the 36 articles were compared in terms of statistical analysis, including top publishing countries, data sources, variables, input, and output horizon, followed by an overall model comparison demonstrating every proposed model categorized into model type (artificial neural network units, recurrent units, convolutional units, and transformer units). Due to the mostly utilization of specific private datasets measured at the targeted location, having universal error metrics is crucial for clear global benchmarking. Root Mean Squared Error and Mean Absolute Error were the most utilized metrics, although they specifically demonstrate the accuracy relative to their respective sites. However, 33% utilized universal metrics, such as Mean Absolute Percentage Error, Normalized Root Mean Squared Error, and the Coefficient of Determination. Finally, trends, challenges, and future research were highlighted for the relevant topic to spotlight and bypass the current challenges.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPhotovoltaic power forecastinges_ES
dc.subjectDeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectTime serieses_ES
dc.titleTowards energy efficiency: A comprehensive review of deep learning-based photovoltaic power forecasting strategieses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33419
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional