Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTorres Banduc, Maximiliano A.
dc.contributor.authorJerez Mayorga, Daniel Alejandro 
dc.contributor.authorCHIROSA RÍOS, LUIS JAVIER 
dc.contributor.authorChirosa-Ríos, Chirosa
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T13:57:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T13:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-18
dc.identifier.citationTorres Banduc, M. et. al. 283 (2024) 114618. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114618]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/93481
dc.description.abstractPurpose: to explore lower limb muscle activity concerning limb dominance, as well as variations in force and power during the standing up and sitting down phases of the instrumented sit-to-stand-to-sit test in sedentary individuals, across isokinetic and isotonic modalities. Methods: 33 sedentary individuals underwent testing using a functional electromechanical dynamometer in both isokinetic and isotonic modes, accompanied by surface electromyography. Results: In the isokinetic mode, the non-dominant gastrocnemius medialis and vastus medialis exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) higher muscle activity values during the standing up and sitting down phase compared to dominant counterparts. In the isotonic mode standing up phase, significant differences in muscle activity were noted for non-dominant gastrocnemius medialis, vastus medialis, and biceps femoris compared to their dominant counterparts. The sitting down phase in isotonic mode showed higher muscle activity for non-dominant vastus medialis compared to dominant vastus medialis. Regard to performance outcomes, significantly lower (p < 0.0001) values were observed for standing up (12.7 ± 5.1 N/kg) compared to sitting down (15.9 ± 6.1 N/kg) peak force, as well as for standing up (18.7 ± 7.8 W/kg) compared to sitting down (25.9 ± 9.7 W/kg) peak power in isokinetic mode. In isotonic mode, lower values were found for sitting down (6.5 (6.3–7.1) N/kg) compared to standing up (7.8 (7.3–8.9) N/kg) peak force and for sitting down (18.5 (13.2–21.7) W/kg) compared to standing up (33.7 (22.8–41.6) W/kg) peak power. Conclusions: Limb dominance influences lower-limb muscle activity during the instrumented sit-to-stand-to-sit test, and the choice of testing mode (isokinetic or isotonic) affects muscle engagement and performance outcomes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrant A.SEJ.227.UGR23 funded by Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación and by ERDF Andalusia Program 2021–2027es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectSit-to-standes_ES
dc.subjectSurface electromyographyes_ES
dc.subjectMuscle activityes_ES
dc.titleExploring lower limb muscle activity and performance variations during instrumented Sit-to-Stand-to-Sit in sedentary individuals: Influence of limb dominance and testing modalitieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114618
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional