Effect of Simulated Dental Pulpal Pressure Using Fetal Bovine Serum for the Bonding Performance of Contemporary Adhesive to Dentin
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Li, Yitong; Maeno, Masahiko; Cifuentes Jiménez, Carolina Cecilia; Komoto, Mei; Liu, Yunqing; Nara, Yoichiro; Sano, Hidehiko; Álvarez Lloret, Pedro; Yamauti, Monica; Tomokiyo, AtsushiEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Microtensile bond strength Simulated pulpal pressure Dentin
Fecha
2024-04-26Referencia bibliográfica
Li, Y.; Maeno, M.; Cifuentes-Jimenez, C.C.; Komoto, M.; Liu, Y.; Nara, Y.; Sano, H.; Alvarez-Lloret, P.; Yamauti, M.; Tomokiyo, A. Effect of Simulated Dental Pulpal Pressure Using Fetal Bovine Serum for the Bonding Performance of Contemporary Adhesive to Dentin. Polymers 2024, 16, 1219. [https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16091219]
Patrocinador
Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Number JP21K19608); JST SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2119); the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); Next Generation/E.U. programResumen
This study evaluated the effect of simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) conditions and storage
time on contemporary adhesive systems’ microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin. Extracted
human molars were prepared and randomly divided into four groups according to the adhesives:
Clearfil Megabond 2 (CSE), Beautibond Xtreme Universal (BXU), G2-Bond (G2B), and Scotchbond
Universal Plus (SBP). Each adhesive group was further divided following the SPP conditions: control
with no simulation (SPP-CTR), SPP with distilled water (SPP-DTW), and SPP with fetal bovine serum
(SPP-FBS). Resin composite build-ups were prepared, and teeth were stored in water (37 ◦C) for 24 h
(24 h) and 3 months (3 m). Then, teeth were sectioned to obtain resin–dentin bonded beams and
tested to determine the μTBS. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc tests
(=0.05), and Weibull failure analysis. Failure mode was observed using scanning electron microscopy.
The μTBS response was affected by adhesive systems, simulated pulpal pressure conditions, and
storage time. SPP-CTR groups presented a higher overall bond strength than SPP-DTW and SPP-FBS,
which were not significantly different from each other. Only for SBP, the SPP-FBS group showed
higher μTBS than the SPP-DTW group. The Weibull analysis showed that the bonding reliability and
durability under SPP-DTW and SPP-FBS were inferior to SPP-CTR, and the 24 h bonding quality of
adhesives to dentin was superior to that of 3 m. SPP drastically reduced the μTBS of all adhesives to
dentin regardless of solution (distilled water or fetal bovine serum). Storage after 3 m also decreased
μTBS despite the SPP condition.





