Agrobiodiversity threats amid expanding woody monocultures and hopes nourished through farmer and food movements in the Mediterranean
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Zimmerer, Karl S.; Aumeeruddy Thomas, Yildiz; Caillon, Sophie; Jiménez Olivencia, Yolanda; Porcel Rodríguez, Laura; Duvall, Chris S.Editorial
Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
Materia
Sustainable food systems Food agrobiodiversity Food movements
Fecha
2024-03-27Referencia bibliográfica
Zimmerer, K.S. et. al. Elem Sci Anth, 12: 1. [https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00093]
Patrocinador
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033 for the project “Researching how to integrate sustainability and competitiveness in Agrifood Mediterranean Landscapes: Agrobiodiversity, climate change and local development” (AGROFOODSCAPES) (PID2020- 117198RB-I00).Resumen
The high biodiversity of food and agriculture (agrobiodiversity) in the Mediterranean exists in rapidly
changing landscapes and food systems. The first goal of this Commentary is to explain how agrobiodiverse
Mediterranean food cereals and legumes are threatened by the accelerating expansion and intensification of
monocultures of woody crops—principally olive, nut, grape, and citrus monocrops—in landscapes of the
western Mediterranean (Spain, Morocco, and France). Its second goal is to explain the key countervailing
force of specific food and farmer movements, organizations, and practices supporting agrobiodiversity. We
argue this food agrobiodiversity support is timely and vital because of growing threats. Intensive woody
monocultures have been promoted for climate change adaptation and policies, while the proposed
agroecological alternatives to woody monocultures show a mixed record regarding the support of food
agrobiodiversity. The Mediterranean’s boom of woody monocultures relies on increased irrigation, including
groundwater extraction, that undermines water sustainability. We engage with policy to explain how the
timely support of food agrobiodiversity by farmer and food movements and practices demonstrates the
production–consumption linkages that can strengthen sustainability, biodiversity conservation, and climate
change adaptation/mitigation. Our policy arguments focus on the promising bridge of agrobiodiversity’s
production–consumption linkages to agroecology as an increasingly influential approach in these policy
sectors. Finally, as a key complementary goal, we reflect on current agrobiodiversity-monoculture challenges
by engaging the broad themes of rural–urban networks and urbanization in the Mediterranean, the land sparing
versus land sharing debate, and the Plantationocene concept. Each thematic reflection enhances the
understanding of food agrobiodiversity threats and support, landscapes of mixed agrobiodiversity and
intensified woody monocultures (monoculture-agrobiodiversity landscapes), and relevant policy insight.





