Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGalindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález de Buitrago García, Juan Eladio
dc.contributor.authorPadial Molina, Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorFernández Barbero, Juan Emilio 
dc.contributor.authorAta Ali, Javier
dc.contributor.authorO'Valle Ravassa, Francisco Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T06:55:37Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01T06:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Galindo-Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, Worsaae N, Schramm A, Padial-Molina M, Maiorana C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants: 5-years follow-up of a multicentre prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(12), 2017, 1584–1591.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/92884
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Galindo-Moreno P, de Buitrago JG, Padial-Molina M, Fernández-Barbero JE, Ata-Ali J, O′Valle F. Histopathological comparison of healing after maxillary sinus augmentation using xenograft mixed with autogenous bone versus allograft mixed with autogenous bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2018, 29(2): 192-201], which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13098]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.es_ES
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the clinical and histologic outcomes of two different grafting materials (allograft and xenograft) when combined with autogenous bone and covered with a collagen membrane for sinus augmentation. Material & Methods: A parallel case series of fourteen patients in need of a unilateral sinus augmentation was evaluated in this study. Seven patients received a graft composed by autologous cortical bone and anorganic bovine bone in a ratio of 1:1; the other seven patients received autologous cortical bone mixed with an allograft in the same ratio. Bone biopsies were obtained 6 months after sinus augmentation at the time of implant placement. Comparative histomorphometrical, histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted and statistically analyzed. Results: After 12 months of functional loading, all implants in both groups were clinical and radiographically successful. Histomorphometrically, although the initial bone formation was not significantly different between groups (new mineralized tissue: 41.03(12.87)% vs. 34.50(13.18)%, p=0.620; allograft vs. xenograft groups), the graft resorbed faster in the allograft group (remnant graft particles: 9.83(7.77)% vs. 21.71(17.88)%; p=0.026; allograft vs. xenograft groups). Non-mineralized tissue did not statistically differ either (49.00(14.32)% vs. 43.79(19.90)%; p=0.710; allograft vs. xenograft groups). The histologic analyses revealed higher cellular content, four times more osteoid lines and higher vascularization in the xenograft group. Musashi-1 (mesenchymal stromal cell marker) was also more intensively expressed in the xenograft group (p=0.019). Conclusions: Both composite grafts generate adequate substratum to receive dental implants after healing. Compared with the xenograft composite, allograft composite shows faster turnover and a quicker decrease in biological action after 6 months.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors of this manuscript were partially supported by Research Groups #CTS-138 and #CTS-1028 (Junta de Andalucía, Spain). MPM is also supported by the Andalucía Talent Hub Program from the Andalusian Knowledge Agency (co-funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program, Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions (COFUND – Grant Agreement nº 291780) and the Ministry of Economy, Innovation, Science and Employment of the Junta de Andalucía). This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMaxillary sinus augmentationes_ES
dc.subjectBiomaterialses_ES
dc.subjectAnorganic bovine bonees_ES
dc.subjectDental implants es_ES
dc.titleHistopathological comparison of healing after maxillary sinus augmentation using xenograft mixed with autogenous bone versus allograft mixed with autogenous bonees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13029
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional