Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSanabria de la Torre, Raquel 
dc.contributor.authorCeres Muñoz, María
dc.contributor.authorPretel Lara, Carlota
dc.contributor.authorMontero Vílchez, Trinidad
dc.contributor.authorArias Santiago, Salvador Antonio 
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T07:58:20Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07T07:58:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-29
dc.identifier.citationSanabria-de la Torre, R.; Ceres-Muñoz, M.; Pretel-Lara, C.; Montero-Vílchez, T.; Arias-Santiago, S. Microtopography and Barrier Function in Healthy Skin: Differences between Forearm, Cheek and Palm. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 5. https:// doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010005es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/92414
dc.descriptionAuthor Keywords: body sites; healthy skin; homeostasis; microtopography; skin barrier function; skin biophysical parameters.es_ES
dc.descriptionOpenAire Keywords: Chemistry, Aging, skin biophysical parameters, homeostasis, microtopography, skin barrier function, healthy skin, Pharmaceutical Science, Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous), Surgery, body sites, Dermatology, QD1-999es_ES
dc.description.abstract(1) Background: Skin barrier function resides mostly in the stratum corneum, which consists of a protein component, the corneocyte (bricks), which provides a scaffold for the second component, the extracellular matrix, consisting of multilayers of lipids (mortar). These two components closely interact and this could be the basis for the differences in the biophysical properties of the skin between anatomical regions. So, the aim of this study was to compare skin microstructural properties between body sites. (2) Methods: A comparative study was conducted that included healthy individuals without previous skin diseases. Skin barrier function parameters and microtopography parameters (smoothness, roughness, desquamation, wrinkles, surface, volume, contrast, variance, homogeneity, anisotropy, total cell count, flaking index, skin surface hardness, brightness, deformability and friction) were measured on the forearm, cheek and palm. (3) Results: 44 participants were included in this study, with a mean age of 38.8 ± 15.0 years. Significant differences were found between body sites for 14 of the 15 parameters evaluated. Smoothness was higher on the forearm than on the cheek and palm (240.02 Sems vs. 348.16 vs. 408.19 Sems, p < 0.05). Hardness was higher on the palm than on the forearm and cheek (13.22 AU vs. 9.44 AU vs. 7.94 AU, p < 0.05). Moreover, we observed that sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, tobacco and/or alcohol use, influenced the parameters evaluated. (4) Conclusions: The differences in skin barrier function and microtopography between anatomical regions reflects the different structure of skin in each body part and could help to understand the influence of the sociodemographic characteristics on theses parameters. This information could be useful for comparison with pathological skin characteristics and for targeting new treatments.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) . Project PI23/01875es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSkin healthes_ES
dc.subjectHomeostasis es_ES
dc.titleMicrotopography and Barrier Function in Healthy Skin: Differences between Forearm, Cheek and Palmes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cosmetics11010005
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional