Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Acute Effect of Velocity-Based Resistance Training on Subsequent Endurance Running Performance: Volume and Intensity Relevance
dc.contributor.author | Pérez Castilla, Alejandro | |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz Alías, Santiago Alejo | |
dc.contributor.author | Ramírez Campillo, Rodrigo | |
dc.contributor.author | Miras Moreno, Sergio | |
dc.contributor.author | García Pinillos, Felipe | |
dc.contributor.author | Marcos Blanco, Aitor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-04T08:09:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-04T08:09:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pérez-Castilla, A.; Ruiz-Alias, S.A.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Miras-Moreno, S.; García-Pinillos, F.; Marcos-Blanco, A. Acute Effect of Velocity-Based Resistance Training on Subsequent Endurance Running Performance: Volume and Intensity Relevance. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072736 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10481/92295 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to compare the acute effect of four back squat velocity-based training (VBT) protocols in terms of intensity (60% vs. 80% of the one repetition maximum [1RM]) and volume (10% vs. 30% threshold for velocity loss in the set) on the maximal aerobic speed (MAS) estimated from a running track test (RTT) in recreationally trained young adult men and women. Twenty participants (eleven men and nine women) undertook five randomized protocols in separate occasions: (i) RTT alone (control condition); (ii) VBT with 60% 1RM and a 10% velocity loss followed by RTT (VBT60–10 + RTT); (iii) VBT with 60% 1RM and a 30% velocity loss followed by RTT (VBT60–30 + RTT); (iv) VBT with 80% 1RM and 10% velocity loss followed by RTT (VBT80–10 + RTT); (v) VBT with 80% 1RM and 30% velocity loss followed by RTT (VBT80–30 + RTT). All VBT protocols involved three sets with three minutes of rest. The MAS was higher for RTT (control) than VBT60–30 + RTT (p < 0.001; Δ = 3.8%), VBT60–10 + RTT (p = 0.006; Δ = 2.8%), VBT80–10 + RTT (p = 0.008; Δ = 2.7%), and VBT80–30 + RTT (p = 0.019; Δ = 1.9%). No protocol × sex interaction was noted (p = 0.422). Therefore, regardless of sex, MAS is acutely impaired after VBT, especially if the training sets are performed with a low relative load and a high velocity loss threshold. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | PhD thesis conducted in the Biomedicine Doctoral Studies of the University of Granada, Spain | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Granada under a project for young investigators (code: PPJIA2022-02) | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Endurance training | es_ES |
dc.subject | Human physical conditioning | es_ES |
dc.subject | Musculoskeletal and neural physiological phenomena | es_ES |
dc.title | Acute Effect of Velocity-Based Resistance Training on Subsequent Endurance Running Performance: Volume and Intensity Relevance | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/app14072736 | |
dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |