Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorMayorga-Vega, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCasado Robles, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorGuijarro Romero, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorViciana Ramírez, Jesús 
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-25T10:13:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-25T10:13:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.identifier.citationDaniel Mayorga-Vega, Carolina Casado-Robles, Santiago Guijarro-Romero, Jesús Viciana. (2024) Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (23), 79 - 96. https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.79es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/91157
dc.description.abstractThe purposes were to examine the criterion-related validity of the steps estimated by consumer-wearable activity trackers (wristworn activity trackers: Fitbit Ace 2, Garmin Vivofit Jr, and Xiomi Mi Band 5; smartphone applications: Pedometer, Pedometer Pacer Health, and Google Fit/Apple Health) and their comparability in primary schoolchildren under controlled conditions. An initial sample of 66 primary schoolchildren (final sample = 56; 46.4% females), aged 9-12 years old (mean = 10.4 ± 1.0 years), wore three wrist-worn activity trackers (Fitbit Ace 2, Garmin Vivofit Jr 2, and Xiaomi Mi Band 5) on their non-dominant wrist and had three applications in two smartphones (Pedometer, Pedometer Pacer Health, and Google Fit/Apple Health for Android/iOS installed in Samsung Galaxy S20+/iPhone 11 Pro Max) in simulated front trouser pockets. Primary schoolchildren’s steps estimated by the consumer-wearable activity trackers and the video-based counting independently by two researchers (gold standard) were recorded while they performed a 200-meter course in slow, normal and brisk pace walking, and running conditions. Results showed that the criterion-related validity of the step scores estimated by the three Samsung applications and the Garmin Vivofit Jr 2 were good-excellent in the four walking/running conditions (e.g., MAPE = 0.6 - 2.3%; lower 95% CI of the ICC = 0.81 - 0.99), as well as being comparable. However, the Apple applications, Fitbit Ace 2, and Xiaomi Mi Band 5 showed poor criterion-related validity and comparability on some walking/running conditions (e.g., lower 95% CI of the ICC < 0.70). Although, as in real life primary schoolchildren also place their smartphones in other parts (e.g., schoolbags, hands or even somewhere away from the body), the criterion-related validity of the Garmin Vivofit Jr 2 potentially would be considerably higher than that of the Samsung applications. The findings of the present study highlight the potential of the Garmin Vivofit Jr 2 for monitoring primary schoolchildren’s steps under controlled conditions.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipI + D + I Fit-Person project (Reference: PID2019110179GB-100), funded by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJournal of Sports Science and Medicinees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectValidationes_ES
dc.subjectWrist-worn activity trackerses_ES
dc.subjectSmartphone applicationses_ES
dc.titleCriterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.52082/jssm.2024.79
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional