Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Automated blood culture systems

dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Fernández, José 
dc.contributor.authorde la Higuera, A.
dc.contributor.authorPiédrola Angulo, Gonzalo
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T10:53:05Z
dc.date.available2024-04-23T10:53:05Z
dc.date.issued1995-02
dc.identifier.citationGutiérrez J, de la Higuera A, Piédrola G. Automated blood culture systems. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1995;53(1-2):25-8.es_ES
dc.identifier.otherPMID: 7574087.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/91084
dc.description.abstractThis review compares automated systems of blood culture for the detection of positive bottles, excluding mycobacteria. The performance of different systems is influenced by several key variables, including volume of the blood sample, the use of resins, shaking to increase the recovery of aerobic microorganisms, duration of incubation and final subculture. The Bactec, BacT/Alert, BioArgos and ESP systems require further study and technical improvement. There is no single ideal system of blood culture, and combinations of two or more methods are likely to provide the best results.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAnn Biol Clin (Paris) .es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAutomated blood culture systemses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]
Nombre:
bloodautomated.pdf
Tamaño:
553.3Kb
Formato:
PDF

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional