Automated blood culture systems

dc.contributor.author	Gutiérrez Fernández, José
dc.contributor.author	de la Higuera, A.
dc.contributor.author	Piédrola Angulo, Gonzalo
dc.date.accessioned	2024-04-23T10:53:05Z
dc.date.available	2024-04-23T10:53:05Z
dc.date.issued	1995-02
dc.identifier.citation	Gutiérrez J, de la Higuera A, Piédrola G. Automated blood culture systems. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1995;53(1-2):25-8.	es_ES
dc.identifier.other	PMID: 7574087.
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10481/91084
dc.description.abstract	This review compares automated systems of blood culture for the detection of positive bottles, excluding mycobacteria. The performance of different systems is influenced by several key variables, including volume of the blood sample, the use of resins, shaking to increase the recovery of aerobic microorganisms, duration of incubation and final subculture. The Bactec, BacT/Alert, BioArgos and ESP systems require further study and technical improvement. There is no single ideal system of blood culture, and combinations of two or more methods are likely to provide the best results.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	eng	es_ES
dc.publisher	Ann Biol Clin (Paris) .	es_ES
dc.rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/	*
dc.title	Automated blood culture systems	es_ES
dc.type	journal article	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	open access	es_ES

Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional