Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLópez Cortes, LF
dc.contributor.authorViciana, Pompeyo
dc.contributor.authorGirón González, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Palacios, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMárquez Solero, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Pérez, María Ángeles 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Ruz, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorDe la Torre Lima, Javier
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Fernández, Marcial
dc.contributor.authorGasrvía Lázaro, Milagros
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorOmar Mohamed-Balghata, Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-22T10:38:34Z
dc.date.available2024-04-22T10:38:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.citationLópez-Cortés LF, Viciana P, Girón-González JA, Romero-Palacios A, Márquez-Solero M, et al. (2014) Clinical and Virological Efficacy of Etravirine Plus Two Active Nucleos(t)ide Analogs in an Heterogeneous HIV-Infected Population. PLoS ONE 9(5): e97262. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097262es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/91001
dc.description.abstractEtravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination in two scenarios: group A) subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) switched due to adverse events and group B) subjects switched after a virologic failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen. The primary endpoint was efficacy at 52 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Virologic failure was defined as the inability to suppress plasma HIV-RNA to ,50 copies/mL after 24 weeks on treatment, or a confirmed viral load .200 copies/mL in patients who had previously achieved a viral suppression or had an undetectable viral load at inclusion. Two hundred eighty seven patients were included. Treatment efficacy rates in group A and B were 88.0% (CI95, 83.9–92.1%) and 77.4% (CI95, 65.0–89.7%), respectively; the rates reached 97.2% (CI95, 95.1–99.3%) and 90.5% (CI95, 81.7–99.3), by on-treatment analysis. The once-a-day ETV treatment was as effective as the twice daily dosing regimen. Grade 1–2 adverse events were observed motivating a treatment switch in 4.2% of the subjects. In conclusion, ETV (once- or twice daily) plus two analogs is a suitable, well-tolerated combination both as a switching strategy and after failure with first generation NNRTIs, ensuring full drug activity.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversity of Rome Tor Vergataes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.titleClinical and virological efficacy of etravirine plus two active Nucleos(t)ide analogs in an heterogeneous HIV-infected populationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0097262
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License