A Synthetic Voice for an Assistive Conversational Agent: A Survey to Discover Italian Preferences regarding Synthetic Voice’s Gender and Quality Level
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Cuciniello, Marialucia; Amorese, Terry; Greco, Claudia; Callejas Carrión, Zoraida; Vogel, Carl; Cordasco, Gennaro; Esposito, AnnaEditorial
Hindawi
Fecha
2023-12-28Referencia bibliográfica
Marialucia Cuciniello, Terry Amorese, Claudia Greco, Zoraida Callejas Carrión, Carl Vogel, Gennaro Cordasco, Anna Esposito, "A Synthetic Voice for an Assistive Conversational Agent: A Survey to Discover Italian Preferences regarding Synthetic Voice’s Gender and Quality Level", Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2023, Article ID 8858268, 15 pages, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8858268
Patrocinador
European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N.769872 (EMPATHIC) and N. 823907 (MENHIR); Project SIROBOTICS that received funding from Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell ‘Università, e della Ricerca (MIUR), PNR 2015-2020, D.D. 1735/2017; Project ANDROIDS that received funding from Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” inside the programme V:ALERE 2019, funded with D.R. 906/2019; Project SALICE that received funding from Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” inside the programme Giovani Ricercatori (DR 509/2022), funded with DR 834/2022Resumen
Based on a previous investigation, a quantitative study aimed to identify user’ preferences towards four synthetic voices of two
different quality levels (classified through the sophistication of the synthesizer: low vs. high) is proposed. The voices
administered to participants were developed considering two main aspects: the voice quality (high/low) and their gender
(male/female). 182 unpaid participants were recruited for the study, divided in four groups according to their age, and
therefore classified as adolescents, young adults, middle-aged, and seniors. To collect data regarding each voice, randomly
audited by participants, the shortened version of the Virtual Agent Voice Acceptance Questionnaire (VAVAQ) was exploited.
Outcomes of the previous study revealed that the voices of high quality, regardless of their gender, received a higher acclaim by
all participants examined rather than the corresponding two voices assessed as lower quality. Conversely, findings of the
current study suggest that the four new groups of participants involved agreed in showing their strong preference towards the
high-quality voice gendered as female compared to all the other considered voices. Regarding the two voices gendered as male,
the high-quality one was considered as more original and capable to arouse positive emotional states than the low-quality one.
Moreover, the high-quality male voice was judged as more natural than the female low-quality one. Results provide some
insights for future directions in the user experience and design field.