Intermixed Rapid Exposure to Similar Stimuli Reduces the Effective Salience of Their Distinctive Features
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
American Psychological Association
Materia
Perceptual learning Comparison Intermixed/blocked effect Effective salience Unitization
Fecha
2023-05-05Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Sánchez, J., González, A. & de Brugada, I. (2023). Intermixed Rapid Exposure to Similar Stimuli Reduces the Effective Salience of Their Distinctive Features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition. DOI:10.1037/xan0000355
Patrocinador
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER “Una manera de hacer Europa” (PGC2018-095965-B-I00, PI:IB)Resumen
Intermixed exposure to two similar stimuli, e.g., AX and BX, improves subsequent discrimination between them compared to
blocked exposure (the intermixed/blocked effect). Salience modulation models, developed mainly from research with
nonhuman animals and exposure to widely spaced similar stimuli, explain this effect in terms of increased salience of the
unique elements, A and B. Conversely, results from experiments initially conducted with humans and exposure to close spaced
similar stimuli have led to the suggestion that it is the development of well-unitized representations of unique elements that
leads to better discrimination, leaving the unique elements with less effective salience. The experiments carried out here aim
to replicate the intermixed/blocked effect in rats using an exposure procedure with rapid succession between stimuli and to
assess the effective salience of unique elements. In Experiment 1, an aversion to a new flavor, Y, was conditioned and then an
external inhibition test with AY was given. In Experiment 2, an aversion to A was conditioned and its extinction was measured
on unreinforced trials. In Experiment 3, an aversion to AY was conditioned and the associated aversion to Y was measured. We
found after rapid intermixed preexposure a reduction in generalization from the aversive Y element to the compound AY
(Experiment 1) as well as a reduction in A’s salience (Experiments 2 and 3) compared to the effects of blocked preexposure.
The results are discussed in terms of the various mechanisms underlying perceptual learning, which appear to depend on the
details of the task.