Experiences to keep university students engaged and avoid student drop-out: some best practice examples for French studies.
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Ruyffelaert, ArianeEditorial
IATED Academy
Materia
innovation student engagement drop-out Degree in French Studies best practice examples
Fecha
2022Referencia bibliográfica
Ruyffelaert, A. (2022). Experiences to keep university students engaged and avoid student drop-out: Some best practice examples for French Studies, EDULEARN22 Proceedings, pp. 6746-6751.
Patrocinador
This study was supported by Grant Nº21-15 (Proyecto de Innovación y Buenas Prácticas Docentes Básicos II 2021-2022, Universidad de Granada, España).Resumen
The final report of 2016 for the renewal of the accreditation [1] of the “Bachelor’s Degree in French
Studies” of the University of Granada (UGR), prepared by the Direction of Evaluation and Accreditation
of the Andalusian Knowledge Agency (DEVA-AAC) mentioned a number of problems that afflict the
Degree. In this context, the graduation rate, the initial drop-out rate and the cumulative drop-out rate
were highlighted. The teaching team of the Department of French Philology is very aware that such
rates are unacceptable, since the first rate is below the average of all studies at the UGR, even below
similar studies (Art and Humanities).
Since several academic years, this team has been working on improvement actions aimed at remedying
this situation, analyzing the causes of this abandonment, and proposing a series of specific actions. We
understand, however, that there is no magic wand, that such a problem is due to a multitude of factors,
and that in some cases the scope for action is limited as it affects variables that are beyond direct control
(orientation in secondary education, organization of teaching, absence of level tests in accessing
university, number of students,...). On the other hand, we understand that we have a real responsibility
in one of the parameters that decisively influence the success, drop-out, efficiency and performance
rates of our students, such as the impact on the learning culture with which they approach their studies
at university, their attitudes and their involvement in learning.
It is clear that intervention in these factors involves slow work, as is any change in cultural patterns and
behaviors. And it cannot therefore be pretended that the actions we have undertaken provide an
immediate solution, but rather mark a path that will lead, with the efforts of all the sectors involved
(teachers, students, university administration, quality unit), towards a progressive reduction of such
drop-out rates, and the improvement of the rest of the indicators to which we have alluded (success,
efficiency, performance).
The Quality Improvement Plan, approved in 2016, and put into action since the academic year 2016-
2017, includes a series of sections and several actions in order to avoid abandonment and improving
student engagement.
Finally, we would like to point out that the implementation of these actions has led to an improvement in
some of the rates indicated above, which encourages us to maintain them, strengthen them and
personalize them. We can indeed see that, in the last years, the rate of initial abandonment and
accumulated abandonment have improved significantly, although the graduation rate (completion of
studies in the planned years) needs a follow-up.