Tissue engineering in otorhinolaryngology: A knowledge-based analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Padilla Cabello, Javier; Martín Piedra, Miguel Ángel; Santisteban Espejo, Antonio; Moral-Muñoz, Jose AntonioEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Otorhinolaryngology Tissue engineering Global trends Knowledge-based analysis Science mapping analysis
Date
2023-12Referencia bibliográfica
Padilla-Cabello J, Martin-Piedra MA, Santisteban-Espejo A, Moral-Munoz JA. Tissue engineering in otorhinolaryngology: A knowledge-based analysis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023;9(1):e1182. doi:10.1002/lio2.1182
Sponsorship
Spanish State Research Agency PID2019-105381GA-I00/AEI/10; 13039/501100011033 (iScience); Junta de Andalucía CTS-115Abstract
Objective: To analyze the impact, performance, degree of specialization, and collaboration patterns of the worldwide scientific production on tissue engineering in otorhinolaryngology at the level of countries and institutions.
Methods: Two different techniques were used, performance and science mapping analyses, using as samples all the available documents regarding tissue
engineering focused on otorhinolaryngology applications. The dataset was
retrieved from the Core Collection of the Web of Science database from 1900
to 2020. Social structure was analyzed using science mapping analysis with
VOSviewer software.
Results: The United States was the main producer, followed by Germany, and
Japan. Malaysia and Germany had the highest Relative Specialization Index,
indicating their greater relative interest in this area compared to other countries. The social structure analysis showed that the United States and Germany
had significant co-authorship relationships with other countries. The University
of California System, Kyoto University, and Harvard University were the leading institutions producing literature in this field. These latter two institutions
showed the largest number of collaborations, although most of them were with
institutions within their own country. There was a lack of connections between
different communities of research.
Conclusion: The United States is the main country driving progress in this
research area, housing the most notable institutions. However, significant collaborations between these research centers are currently lacking. Encouraging
greater cooperation among these institutions and their researchers would promote the exchange of knowledge, ultimately facilitating and accelerating
advancements in this field.