• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Óptica
  • DO - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Óptica
  • DO - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of a blue-blocking screen filter on accommodative accuracy and visual discomfort

[PDF] OPO20b.pdf (415.1Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/88543
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12738
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Redondo Cabrera, Beatriz; Vera Vílchez, Jesús; Ortega Sanchez, Alba; Molina Romero, Rubén; Jiménez Rodríguez, Raimundo
Editorial
Wiley
Fecha
2020
Referencia bibliográfica
Redondo, B., Vera, J., Ortega‐Sánchez, A., Molina, R., & Jiménez, R. (2020). Effects of a blue‐blocking screen filter on accommodative accuracy and visual discomfort. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 40(6), 790-800.
Resumen
Introduction The prescription of blue-blocking (B-B) filters for the management of visual symptoms and signs associated with the use of electronic devices is routinely performed by eye care specialists. However, the utility of B-B filters is a matter of debate and discussion by the scientific community due to the lack of evidence supporting their use. Here, we aimed to determine the effects of using B-B filters on the dynamics of the accommodative response and pupil size and perceived levels of visual discomfort, while performing a 30-min reading task at a close distance in subjects who routinely use electronic devices. Methods Nineteen healthy young adults (22.0 ± 2.7 years) read two 30-min passages on a computer screen placed at 50 cm, either while using a commercially available B-B filter or without any filter on two different days. The magnitude and variability of both the accommodative response and pupil size were dynamically measured for 60 s using the WAM-5500 open field autorefractometer at 4–5, 9–10, 14–15, 19–20, 24–25, and 29–30 min into the trial. The perceived levels of visual discomfort were also obtained. Results The lag and variability of accommodation were insensitive to the blue light level (p = 0.34 and 0.62, respectively). There was a time-on-task effect for the variability of accommodation, showing greater instability over time regardless of the blue light level. The use of the B-B filter was associated with improved reading speed (p = 0.02), with an increase of 16.5 words per minute. However, it was not associated with any significant change in pupil dynamics or the perceived levels of visual discomfort (p> 0.05 in both cases). Conclusions Our data showed that the use of a B-B filter had no effect on accommodative dynamics or visual symptomatology. Based on these findings, there is no support for the prescription of B-B filters to attenuate the visual symptoms and signs associated with the use of electronic devices in healthy young adults
Colecciones
  • DO - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias