Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorVilla González, Emilio 
dc.contributor.authorBarranco-Ruiz, Yaira 
dc.contributor.authorR. Evenson, Kelly
dc.contributor.authorChillón Garzón, Palma 
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T08:50:32Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T08:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationVilla-González, E., Barranco-Ruiz, Y., Evenson, K. R., & Chillón, P. (2018). Systematic review of interventions for promoting active school transport. Preventive medicine, 111, 115-134.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/88340
dc.description"This is an original manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in PREVENTIVE MEDICINE on JUNE 2018, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010. The citation for this publication is: Villa-González E, Barranco-Ruiz Y, Evenson KR, Chillón P. Systematic review of interventions for promoting active school transport. Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:115-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26. PMID: 29496615. © <2018r>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. It aligns with the hosting policy of Elsevier".es_ES
dc.description.abstractActive commuting to school has been recognized as a potential avenue to increase physical activity in children and adolescents. However, active commuting to school has declined over time, and interventions are needed to reverse this trend. The main aim in the current study was to update a previous systematic review on inter- ventions focused on active travel to school, following the same methodology and addressing the quality and effectiveness of new studies detected in the more recent scientific literature. A systematic review was conducted to identify intervention studies of active commuting to school published from February 2010 to December 2016. Five electronic databases and a manual search were conducted. Detailed information was extracted, including a quantitative assessment comparing the effect sizes, with Cohen's d, and a qualitative assessment using the Evaluation of Public Health Practice Projects tool. We identified 23 interventions that focused on active com- muting to school. Among the 23 interventions, three were randomized control trials, 22 had a pre/post design, and 12 used control groups. Most interventions reported a small effect size on active commuting to school (14/ 23) (d: from‐1.45 to 2.37). The quality assessment was rated as weak in most studies (21/23). Government funding continues investing in public policies to promote active commuting to school. However, even though seven years have passed since the last systematic review, research with high quality designs with randomization, greater sample size, and the use of valid and reliable instruments are needed.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherELSEVIERes_ES
dc.subjectActive commutinges_ES
dc.subjectSchool Younges_ES
dc.subjectIntervention programses_ES
dc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
dc.titleSystematic review of interventions for promoting active school transportes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010
dc.type.hasVersionSMURes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée