Validity of Slaughter Equations and Bioelectrical Impedance Against Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Children
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Martín Matillas, Miguel; Mora González, José Rafael; Hidalgo Migueles, Jairo; Ubago Guisado, Esther; Gracia-Marco, Luis; Ortega Porcel, Francisco BartoloméEditorial
Wiley in Obesity
Materia
Adiposity Adolescents Body composition Anthropometry Degree of obesity Fat mass index Longitudinal changes
Fecha
2020-04Referencia bibliográfica
Martín-Matillas M, Mora-Gonzalez J, Migueles JH, Ubago-Guisado E, Gracia-Marco L, Ortega FB. Validity of Slaughter Equations and Bioelectrical Impedance Against Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Apr;28(4):803-812. doi: 10.1002/oby.22751. Epub 2020 Mar 6. PMID: 32144886.
Patrocinador
The ActiveBrains project was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (References DEP2013-47540, DEP2016-79512-R, and DEP2017-91544-EXP). JMG and JHM are supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport (FPU14/06837 and FPU15/02645, respectively). LGM is funded by “La Caixa” Foundation within the Junior Leader fellowship program (ID 100010434). This study has been partially funded by the University of Granada, UGR Research and Knowledge Transfer Fund (PPIT) 2016, Excellence Actions Programme: Units of Scientific Excellence; Scientific Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES), and by the Regional Government of Andalusia, the Regional Ministry of Economy, Knowledge, Enterprises and University, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (ref. SOMM17/6107/UGR).Resumen
Objectives: i) To analyze the criterion validity of Slaughter’s equations (Slg-Eq) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to estimate body fat percentage (BFP) and fat mass index (FMI) at different degrees of obesity in children, compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and ii) to determine their agreement over the time.
Methods: 92 children with overweight/obesity (10.0±1.2 years; 34.8% girls) participated in this 20-week study. Anthropometric, BIA and DXA measurements were performed.
Results: i) Both Slg-Eq and BIA methods underestimated BFP and FMI against DXA and the bias was markedly larger with BIA (Mean Absolute Percentage Error-MAPE=11% for Slg-Eq vs. 18-21% for BIA); a larger underestimation was observed in girls compared to boys for Slg-Eq (P≤0.001), and the observed underestimation in adiposity was reduced as weight status increased. ii) Systematic errors were kept constant over the time, so that no large differences between methods were observed in the change in adiposity.
Conclusions: At the group level, Slg-Eq provides a more valid estimation of BFP and FMI than BIA. At the individual level, Slg-Eq shows larger estimation errors. The validity of these methods might differ in sex and weight status. Nevertheless, both methods seem to be valid for monitoring changes in adiposity.