Algae-derived hydroxyapatite behavior as bone biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone: A split-mouth clinical, radiological, and histologic randomized study in humans
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Galindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio; Padial Molina, Miguel; López Chaichío, Lucía; Gutierrez Garrido, Lourdes; Martín Morales, Natividad; O'Valle Ravassa, Francisco JavierEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Anorganic bovine bone Bone biomaterial Implant dentistry Maxillary sinus augmentation Ultrastructure Phycogenic biomaterial
Fecha
2020-03-06Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Galindo-Moreno P, Padial-Molina M, Lopez-Chaichio L, Gutiérrez-Garrido L, Martín-Morales N, O'Valle F. Algae-derived hydroxyapatite behavior as bone biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone: A split-mouth clinical, radiological, and histologic randomized study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):536-548. [doi: 10.1111/clr.13590]
Patrocinador
Junta de Andalucía #CTS-138 and #CTS-1028Resumen
Objectives: To analyze a modified biphasic phycogenic biomaterial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone in maxillary sinus floor elevation in humans.
Material and methods: Eight male patients in need of bilateral two-stage sinus floor elevation were consecutively recruited for this randomized split-mouth study. A combination of autogenous cortical bone (ACB, 20%) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB, 80%) (ACB + ABB group) or ACB (20%) and modified biphasic phycogenic material (BP, 80%) (ACB + BP group) were randomly assigned to graft each sinus. Patients were followed up for 6 months post-surgery when bone samples were collected for analysis.
Results: Radiographically, bone height gain was statistically higher in the ACB + ABB versus the ACB + BP group. While the analysis of the biological compartments showed differences in non-mineralized tissue (39.15 ± 20.97% vs. 65.87 ± 28.59%, ACB + ABB vs. ACB + BP respectively; p = .018) and remnant biomaterial particles (22.62 ± 17.01% vs. 7.96 ± 8.57%, respectively; p = .028), the percentage of mineralized tissue (38.23 ± 17.55% vs. 24.14 ± 24.66%, respectively; p = .398) showed no statistically significant difference. In contrast, ACB + ABB biopsies showed higher Musashi-1-positive cells per mm2 compared to ACB + BP biopsies (811.49 ± 875.30 vs. 236.90 ± 280.81; p < .018), where the fusiform cells corresponded mainly with fibroblasts, as demonstrated by ultrastructural analysis.
Conclusion: Both combinations of materials exhibited bone formation after 6 months of healing in the maxillary sinus cavity. However, the combination with biphasic phycogenic biomaterial induced a higher radiographical vertical resorption and graft collapse in comparison with the combination with anorganic bovine bone, possibly due to a higher remodeling of the graft.





