Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Galindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio; Catena Martínez, Andrés; Pérez-Sayáns, Mario; Fernández Barbero, Juan Emilio; O'Valle Ravassa, Francisco Javier; Padial Molina, MiguelEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Alveolar bone Dental implants Peri-implantitis
Fecha
2022-07-13Referencia bibliográfica
Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, Pérez-Sayáns M, Fernández-Barbero JE, O'Valle F, Padial-Molina M. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(5): 630‐642. [doi:10.1111/cid.13122]
Patrocinador
Junta de Andalucía #CTS-138, #CTS-176 and #CTS-1028; Universidad de Granada / CBUA.Resumen
Purpose: The aim of this study was to establish an objective criterion in terms of marginal bone level (MBL) to know the prognosis of an implant.
Materials and methods: A group of 176 patients in whom 590 implants were placed were included in this retrospective study. Patients older than 18 years, presenting either Kennedy class I or II edentulous section, or totally edentulous at least in one of the dental arches were included in this study. Those with any type of disturbance able to alter bone metabolism or with nontreated periodontal disease were excluded. Data on radiographic MBL at loading, 6 and 18 months later, age, gender, smoking habits, history of periodontitis, bone substratum, implant, and prosthetic features were recorded. Nonparametric receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed for the MBL at 18 months in order to establish a distinction among high bone loser (HBL) and low bone loser (LBL) implants. Differences as a function of main variables were also determined, particularly abutment height and periodontal disease.
Results: HBL implants lost at least 0.48 mm of MBL 6 months after loading; they reached at least 2 mm of MBL 18 months after loading. MBL rate followed a nonlinear trend, except in implants restored over long prosthetic abutments and in patients with history of severe periodontitis; in whom the rate of MBL over the time was nearly zero.
Conclusion: Implants that lose more than 0.5 mm of marginal bone 6 months after loading are at great risk of not being radiographically successful anymore. Therefore, 0.5 mm of MBL is proposed as a distinctive and objective criterion of success in Implant Dentistry within a 6-month follow-up period. A prosthetic abutment height ≥2 mm resulted the most protective factor in the peri-implant bone maintenance.