Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFerrer Luque, Carmen María 
dc.contributor.authorBaca García, María Pilar 
dc.contributor.authorSolana, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Archilla, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorArias Moliz, María Teresa 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Linares, Matilde 
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T11:48:17Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T11:48:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-20
dc.identifier.citationFerrer-Luque CM, Baca P, Solana C, Rodríguez-Archilla A, Arias-Moliz MT, Ruiz-Linares M. Antibiofilm Activity of Diclofenac and Antibiotic Solutions in Endodontic Therapy. J Endod. 2021 Jul;47(7):1138-1143es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/87368
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to compare the antibiofilm effects of a triple antibiotic solution (TAS); a double antibiotic solution (DAS); and 5%, 2.5%, and 1.25% diclofenac solutions (DCSs) against Enteroccocus faecalis biofilm. Methods: Eighty-four sterile radicular dentin blocks were used as biofilm substrate for 3 weeks. The study groups were as follows: (1) 1 mg/mL TAS (minocycline, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin), (2) 1 mg/mL DAS (metronidazole and ciprofloxacin), (3) 5% DCS, (4) 2.5% DCS, (5) 1.25% DCS, and (6) 0.9% saline solution. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by bacterial count determinations and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The contact time for the antimicrobial tests was 5 minutes. Bacterial counts were expressed as the reduction percentage of colony-forming units; for the confocal laser scanning microscopic evaluation, the log10 total biovolume and percentage of green population (live cells) were calculated. Results: The colony-forming unit reduction percentage ranged between 62.98 and 98.62, respectively, for TAS and 5% DCS. The DCS showed a concentration-dependent effect.For the confocal laser scanning microscopy, the log10 total biovolume in all groups was very similar and showed a scarce (1.39-1.02) but significant reduction with respect to the control; 5% and 2.5% DCSs gave the lowest viable cell percentage. The TAS and DAS groups showed intermediate values without significant differences between them. Conclusions: DCSs at 5% and 2.5% have greater antimicrobial effects than TAS and DAS and may be considered a valid alternative for controlling the infection of teeth with apical periodontitis.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrupo CTS 167es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleAntibiofilm Activity of Diclofenac and Antibiotic Solutions in Endodontic Therapyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.004
dc.type.hasVersionAOes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[Word 2007]
[File]
[File]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional