Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCastro Ramírez, Cándida 
dc.contributor.authorDoncel, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorLedesma, Ruben D.
dc.contributor.authorMontes, Silvana A.
dc.contributor.authorBarragan, Daniela D.
dc.contributor.authorOviedo Trespalacios, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorKauer, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorQu, Weina
dc.contributor.authorPadilla García, José Luis 
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T07:32:41Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T07:32:41Z
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.identifier.citationC. Castro et al. Accident Analysis and Prevention 195 (2024) 107412 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107412]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/86024
dc.description.abstractThe Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES) is a self-report measure of individual differences in driving inattention. ARDES was originally developed in Spanish (Argentina), and later adapted to other countries and languages. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity of ARDES scores has been obtained in various different countries. However, no study has been conducted to specifically examine the measurement invariance of ARDES measures across countries, thus limiting their comparability. Can different language versions of ARDES provide comparable measures across countries with different traffic regulations and cultural norms? To what extent might cultural differences prevent researchers from making valid inferences based on ARDES measures? Using Alignment Analysis, the present study assessed the approximate invariance of ARDES measures in seven countries: Argentina (n = 603), Australia (n = 378), Brazil (n = 220), China (n = 308). Spain (n = 310), UK (n = 298), and USA (n = 278). The three-factor structure of ARDES scores (differentiating driving errors occurring at Navigation, Manoeuvring and Control levels) was used as the target theoretical model. A fixed alignment analysis was conducted to examine approximate measurement invariance. 12.3 % of the intercepts and 0.8 % of the item-factor loadings were identified as non-invariant, averaging 8.6 % of non-invariance. Despite substantial differences among the countries, sample recruitment or representativeness, study results support resorting to ARDES measures to make comparisons across the country samples. Thus, the range of cultures, laws and collision risk across these 7 countries provides a demanding assessment for a cultural-free inattention while-driving. The alignment analysis results suggest that ARDES measures reach near equivalence among the countries in the study. We hope this study will serve as a basis for future cross-cultural research on driving inattention using ARDES.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrant MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipState Research Agency (SRA) (MCIN/AEI/) (PID2020-113978RB-I00 and PDC2021-12944-I00)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpain and European Regional Fund “ERDF” A way of making Europees_ES
dc.description.sponsorship"European Union” or by the “European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR”es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipJunta de Andalucía I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía (P20_00338, A-SEJ-114-UGR20 and PYC20 RE 022 UGR)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPlan Nacional de Drogas (Ministerio de Sanidad) PND-020-019es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada / CBUAes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.subjectDistracted driveres_ES
dc.subjectProneness to distractiones_ES
dc.subjectNavigation errorses_ES
dc.subjectManoeuvring errorses_ES
dc.subjectControl errorses_ES
dc.subjectPlanning errorses_ES
dc.titleMeasurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countrieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aap.2023.107412
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée