Tsallis Entropy and Mutability to Characterize Seismic Sequences: The Case of 2007–2014 Northern Chile Earthquakes
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Pasten, Denisse; Vogel, Eugenio E.; Saravia, Gonzalo; Posadas Chinchilla, Antonio Miguel; Sotolongo, OscarEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Tsallis entropy Information theory Subduction seismicity
Date
2023-10-05Referencia bibliográfica
Pasten, D.; Vogel, E.E.; Saravia, G.; Posadas, A.; Sotolongo, O. Tsallis Entropy and Mutability to Characterize Seismic Sequences: The Case of 2007–2014 Northern Chile Earthquakes. Entropy 2023, 25, 1417. [https://doi.org/10.3390/e25101417]
Sponsorship
Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación, Junta de Andalucía PID2022-143083NB-I00, RNM104; Financiamiento Basal para Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de Excelencia AFB220001; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1230055 FONDECYT; Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-124701NBC21 y C22 AEI; Universidad de Almería UAL2020-RNM-B1980 UALAbstract
Seismic data have improved in quality and quantity over the past few decades, enabling
better statistical analysis. Statistical physics has proposed new ways to deal with these data to
focus the attention on specific matters. The present paper combines these two progressions to find
indicators that can help in the definition of areas where seismic risk is developing. Our data comes
from the IPOC catalog for 2007 to 2014. It covers the intense seismic activity near Iquique in Northern
Chile during March/April 2014. Centered in these hypocenters we concentrate on the rectangle
Lat−18
−22 and Lon−72
−68 and deepness between 5 and 70 km, where the major earthquakes originate.
The analysis was performed using two complementary techniques: Tsallis entropy and mutability
(dynamical entropy). Two possible forecasting indicators emerge: (1) Tsallis entropy (mutability)
increases (decreases) broadly about two years before the main MW 8.1 earthquake. (2) Tsallis entropy
(mutability) sharply decreases (increases) a few weeks before the MW 8.1 earthquake. The first one is
about energy accumulation, and the second one is because of energy relaxation in the parallelepiped
of interest. We discuss the implications of these behaviors and project them for possible future studies.