Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAlguacil Duarte, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Gómez, Francisco José 
dc.contributor.authorRomero Gámez, Mercedes
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-28T11:35:06Z
dc.date.available2023-11-28T11:35:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-20
dc.identifier.citationAlguacil-Duarte, F., González-Gómez, F., & Romero-Gámez, M. (2022). Biological nitrate removal from a drinking water supply with an aerobic granular sludge technology: An environmental and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133059.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/85898
dc.description.abstractNitrate pollution of groundwater, mainly from agricultural applications, is a widespread water quality problem in many countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare the main environmental impacts and costs associated with removing nitrate from groundwater under a conventional treatment technology and a technology based on a biological treatment process (denitrification using aerobic granular sludge). The analysis focused on the first real-world experience of an industrial-scale implementation of said technology, applied to the drinking water supply in a small town in Spain. The methods selected for the environmental and economic evaluations were life cycle assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis, respectively. The drinking water treatment technologies under study were a conventional reverse osmosis plant and a plant using a biological treatment called ecogranularwater. The analysis of these two drinking water production processes was divided into two phases: structure and water treatment. This study demonstrates that the biological technology produces drinking water in a more environmentally-friendly, cost-effective way, and with lower energy costs. The greatest environmental impacts from the reverse osmosis technology occurred in the water treatment phase due to the high levels of energy consumption (up to 1.68 kWh m-3 higher than with the ecogranularwater technology). In the structure phase, the biological technology contributed more than reverse osmosis in all impact categories, with values ranging from 91% in freshwater ecotoxicity to 98% in stratospheric ozone depletion. The cost of producing 1 m3 of water was estimated as 43% lower with the ecogranularwater technology compared to reverse osmosis. In order to further lessen the environmental impact of the biological technology, efforts should be focused on reducing and optimizing energy use and making improvements to the design of the structure. This biological technology proved a good alternative for small and medium-sized municipalities with problems of nitrate-polluted water. The decision to apply technological innovations in drinking water treatments to remove nitrates can be supported by environmental and economic studies.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissiones_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Regional Development Fundes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipRegional Government of Andalusiaes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenes_ES
dc.subjectNitrate-polluted watees_ES
dc.subjectDrinking wateres_ES
dc.subjectEnvironmental footprintes_ES
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness analysises_ES
dc.subjectBiological treatmentes_ES
dc.titleBiological nitrate removal from a drinking water supply with an aerobic granular sludge technology: An environmental and economic assessmentes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.projectIDLIFE16 ENV/ES/000196es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDP18-RT-576es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133059
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License