The young male driving problem: Relationship between Safe Driving Climate among Friends, Peer Pressure and Driving Styles
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Padilla García, José Luis; Sánchez, Nuria; Doncel, Pablo; Navarro González, María Carmen; Castro Ramírez, CándidaEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Driving styles Road safety Peer pressure Validation Motorcyclists
Fecha
2023-09-16Referencia bibliográfica
J.-L. Padilla et al. The young male driving problem: Relationship between Safe Driving Climate among Friends, Peer Pressure and Driving Styles. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour 98 (2023) 141–156[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.006]
Patrocinador
Grant MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, State Research Agency (SRA) (MCIN/AEI/) (PID2020-113978RB-I00; PDC2021-12944-I00); Spain and European Regional Fund “ERDF” A way of making Europe; European Union; European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR; Junta de Andalucía I + D + I Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía (P20_00338, A-SEJ-114-UGR20; PYC20 RE 022 UGR), Spain; Plan Nacional de Drogas (Ministerio de Sanidad); PND-020-019Resumen
Young people are almost twice as likely to die in traffic crashes than are middle aged people (ages
40 to 60). It remains crucial to assess what factors catalyse young people’s non-adaptive driving
behaviours. In this study, we adapted the SDCaF (Safe Driving Climate among Friends) and RPI
(Resistance to Peer Influence) scales to the driving context in Spain, and measured their relationship
with the Driving Styles (DS) of young Spanish drivers (using the Spanish version of the
Multidimensional Driving Styles Inventory, MDSI). A sample of young Spanish drivers (n = 459;
age 18–25) completed an online questionnaire comprised of the Spanish versions of the SDCaF,
RPI and MDSI scales, sociodemographic variables, driving habits and history. Evidence of the
factorial structure of the Spanish version of the SDCaF scale coincides with those of the original
version: the tetra-factorial model of the SDCaF scale obtained adequate values for the adjustment
indices of the 4 factors; 2 are maladaptive (Peer pressure and Cost of driving with others) and 2
adaptive (Communication on traffic issues and Commitment to safe driving). The estimated
reliability of the SDCaF scale reached acceptable values above (α ordinal greater than 0.80)
except for the Communication factor (α = 0.76). Furthermore, evidence of the structure of the
Spanish version of the RPI scale coincides with that of the original version, unifactorial model.
The estimated reliability of the RPI scale reached acceptable values (α ordinal = 0.81). Most of
the SDCaF’s relationships with RPI and MDSI measures were as theoretically expected. The
MDSI’s maladaptive DS (Reckless, Aggressive and Distracted) correlated positively with the
SDCaF’s factors of Peer Pressure and Cost for driving with friends. The opposite occurred for the
MDSI’s adaptive DS (Careful and Stress Reduction). SDCaF Pressure and Cost factors correlated
negatively with Resistance to Peer Pressure, whereas SDCaF Communication and Commitment
factors correlated positively. We found clear differences by sex: Scores were higher on the
Pressure factor when the driver was a man, when the passengers were men and when driving to a
party. On the other hand, the scores were higher in the Communication and Commitment factors
when the driver was a woman, the passengers were women and when driving somewhere other
than a party. In conclusion, we obtained quality translated instruments and provided support for
their connection with maladaptive driving to evaluate the reckless driving of young people.