Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSoler Cataluña, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorRomero Palacios, Pedro José 
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T07:22:29Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T07:22:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-06
dc.identifier.citationSoler Cataluña, J.J., Romero Palacios, P.J. Lack of Clinical Control in COPD Patients Depending on the Target and the Therapeutic Option. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2023:18 1367–1376es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/85158
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: According to the Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD), when a treatment is not achieving an appropriate response it should be switched taking into account the predominant treatable trait to target (dyspnea or exacerbations). The objective of the present study was to investigate the lack of clinical control according to the target and medication groups. Materials and Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the CLAVE study, an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study which evaluated the clinical control, and related-factors, in a cohort of 4801 patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The primary endpoint was the percentage of uncontrolled patients defined as COPD Assessment Test (CAT) >16 or presence of exacerbations in the last 3 months despite receiving long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) and/or long-acting antimuscarinic antagonist (LAMA) with or without inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Secondary objectives included the description of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients by therapeutic group and the identification of characteristics potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD including low adherence measured by the test to adherence to inhalers (TAI). Results: In the dyspnea pathway, lack of clinical control was of 25.0% of patients receiving LABA or LAMA in monotherapy, 29.5% by those with LABA + LAMA, 38.3% with LABA + ICS and 37.0% with triple therapy (LABA + LAMA + ICS). In the exacerbation pathway, percentages were 87.1%, 76.7%, 83.3%, and 84.1%, respectively. Low physical activity and high Charlson comorbidity index were independent factor of non-control in all therapeutic groups. Additional factors were lower post-bronchodilator FEV1 and poor adherence to inhalers. Conclusion: There are still room for improvement in COPD control. From the pharmacological perspective, every step in treatment have a pool of uncontrolled patients in which a step-up could be considered according to a trait to target strategy.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherDovePresses_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectCOPDes_ES
dc.subjectControles_ES
dc.subjectTargetes_ES
dc.subjectDyspneaes_ES
dc.subjectComorbiditieses_ES
dc.subjectTreatmentes_ES
dc.titleLack of Clinical Control in COPD Patients Depending on the Target and the Therapeutic Optiones_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License