The Impact of Upper Limb Apraxia on General and Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Post-Stroke Patients
Metadata
Show full item recordEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Self-efficacy Self-efficacy for managing symptoms Apraxia Upper limb apraxia Stroke
Date
2023-08-10Referencia bibliográfica
Sánchez-Bermejo, L.; Milla-Ortega, P.J.; Pérez-Mármol, J.M. The Impact of Upper Limb Apraxia on General and Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Post-Stroke Patients. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2252. [https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162252]
Sponsorship
Colegio Profesional de Terapeutas Ocupacionales de Extremadura (COPTOEX); Ayuda a proyectos de investigación en Terapia Ocupacional. Reference number: 2022”. Fundación Progreso y Salud. Consejería de Salud y Consumo. Junta de Andalucía; FPS 2020—“Proyectos de I+i en Atención Primaria, Hospitales Comarcales y Centros Hospitalarios de Alta Resolución del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (CHARES)”. Reference number: AP-0325-2022Abstract
Background: Upper limb apraxia (ULA) is a neurological syndrome characterized by the
inability to perform purposeful movements. ULA could impact individuals’ perceptions, including
perceived self-efficacy. The aim of this study is to investigate whether ULA is related to general selfefficacy
and self-efficacy for managing symptoms in post-stroke patients. Methods: A cross-sectional
study was conducted involving 82 post-stroke patients. Regression analyses were implemented
using a stepwise model including seven dimensions of ULA: imitation (non-symbolic, intransitive,
and transitive), pantomime (non-symbolic, intransitive, and transitive), and dimension of apraxic
performance in activities of daily living. These dimensions were independent variables, while general
self-efficacy and symptom management self-efficacy dimensions were dependent variables. Results:
The findings revealed that intransitive imitation accounted for 14% of the variance in general selfefficacy
and 10% of self-efficacy for managing emotional symptoms. Transitive imitation explained
10% of the variance in self-efficacy for managing global symptoms and 5% for social–home integration
symptoms. The combination of intransitive imitation, non-symbolic pantomime, and alterations
in activities of daily living performance associated with ULA explained 24% of the variance in
cognitive self-efficacy. Conclusions: Hence, ULA dimensions seem to be related to the levels of
general perceived self-efficacy and self-efficacy for managing symptoms among post-stroke patients