Proof of concept of prehabilitation: a combination of education and behavioural change, to promote physical activity in people with fibromyalgia
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Courel Ibáñez, JavierEditorial
Bmj Publishing Group
Date
2023Referencia bibliográfica
Courel-Ibáñez J, Estévez-López F, Hughes C, et al. Proof of concept of prehabilitation: a combination of education and behavioural change, to promote physical activity in people with fibromyalgia. BMJ Open 2023;13:e070609. [doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-070609]
Sponsorship
Health and Social Care Public Health Agency, Northern Ireland (STL/5268/16 to CH and JGM); Ramón y Cajal 2021 Excellence Research Grant action from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (FSE/AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN, RYC2021-034311- I)Abstract
Objectives To establish proof of concept of a
prehabilitation intervention, a combination of education
and behavioural change, preceding a physical activity
programme in people with fibromyalgia (FM).
Settings Open-label,
feasibility clinical trial.
Participants Eleven people with FM (10 women).
Interventions The prehabilitation intervention consisted
of 4 weeks, 1 weekly session (~1 to 1.5 hours), aimed
to increase self-efficacy
and understand why and how
to engage in a gentle and self-paced
physical activity
programme (6 weeks of walking with telephone support).
Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary
outcome was the acceptability and credibility of the
intervention by means of the Credibility/Expectancy
Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes comprised scales to
measure FM severity, specific symptoms and sedentary
behaviour. An exit interview was conducted to identify the
strengths and weaknesses and barriers to the intervention.
Results One participant dropped out due to finding the
walking programme excessively stressful. Participants
expected the intervention would improve their symptoms
by 22%–38% but resulted in 5%–26% improvements.
Participants would be confident in recommending
this intervention to a friend who experiences similar
problems. The interviews suggested that the fluctuation of
symptoms should be considered as an outcome and that
the prehabilitation intervention should accomodate these
fluctuation. Additional suggestions were to incorporate
initial interviews (patient-centred
approach), to tailor the
programmes to individuals’ priorities and to offer a variety
of physical activity programmes to improve motivation.
Conclusions This feasibility study demonstrated that our
novel approach is acceptable to people with FM. Future
interventions should pay attention to flexibility, symptoms
fluctuation and patients support.