Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorPaniagua López, Mario
dc.contributor.authorAguilar Garrido, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorContero-Hurtado, José
dc.contributor.authorSierra Aragón, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorRomero Freire, Ana 
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T12:42:36Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T12:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-24
dc.identifier.citationPaniagua-López, M.; Aguilar-Garrido, A.; Contero-Hurtado, J.; García-Romera, I.; Sierra-Aragón, M.; Romero-Freire, A. Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques. Toxics 2023, 11, 298. [https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040298]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/82412
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the project RTI 2018-094327-B-I00 (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) and by the project E-RNM-444-UGR20 (Operating Research Program FEDER 2014- 2020). The APC was funded by E-RNM-444-UGR20.es_ES
dc.descriptionThe following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics11040298/s1, Table S1: Guideline values (mg/kg) to declare a soil as potentially polluted by legislations of different countries [51–54,90]es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe present work evaluated the influence of eight different soil remediation techniques, based on the use of residual materials (gypsum, marble, vermicompost) on the reduction in metal(loid)s toxicity (Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cd) in a polluted natural area. Selected remediation treatments were applied in a field exposed to real conditions and they were evaluated one year after the application. More specifically, five ecotoxicological tests were carried out using different organisms on either the solid or the aqueous (leachate) fraction of the amended soils. Likewise, the main soil properties and the total, water-soluble and bioavailable metal fractions were determined to evaluate their influence on soil toxicity. According to the toxicity bioassays performed, the response of organisms to the treatments differed depending on whether the solid or the aqueous fraction was used. Our results highlighted that the use of a single bioassay may not be sufficient as an indicator of toxicity pathways to select soil remediation methods, so that the joint determination of metal availability and ecotoxicological response will be determinant for the correct establishment of any remediation technique carried out under natural conditions. Our results indicated that, of the different treatments used, the best technique for the remediation of metal(loid)s toxicity was the addition of marble sludge with vermicompost.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Science and Innovation, Spain (MICINN) Spanish Government RTI 2018-094327-B-I00es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipOperating Research Program FEDER 2014-2020 E-RNM-444-UGR20es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectSoil pollution es_ES
dc.subjectCircular economyes_ES
dc.subjectRemediationes_ES
dc.subjectBioavailabilityes_ES
dc.subjectEcotoxicologyes_ES
dc.subjectBioassayses_ES
dc.subjectHordeum vulgarees_ES
dc.subjectLactuca sativaes_ES
dc.subjectRaphidocelis subcapitataes_ES
dc.subjectDaphnia magnaes_ES
dc.titleEcotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniqueses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/toxics11040298
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional