Free weight training vs. elastic band training: what is a more effective strategy for increasing maximal velocity ability during handball throws?
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Sveuciliste u Zagrebu * Kinezioloski Fakultet
Materia
Load-velocity relationship Resistance training Two-point method
Fecha
2023-03-08Referencia bibliográfica
Vojinovic, A. et al. Free weight training vs. elastic band training: what is a more effective strategy for increasing maximal velocity ability during handball throws?. Kinesiology 55(2023)1:21-29[V]
Resumen
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two resistance training (RT) programs (free
weight [FW] and elastic band [EB]) on velocity variables (handball throwing velocity [HTV] and maximal
theoretical velocity [V0]) using load-velocity (L-V) relationship modelling. Both programs lasted 6 weeks
and consisted of performing bench press and overarm dumbbell pull-over using free weights (FW group)
or elastic bands (EB group). Nineteen male sports science students were randomly assigned to EB (n=10) or
FW group (n=9). Both RT programs increased HTV and V0, although the increment was greater in the FW
(>2 m·s-1) compared to the EB group (<1 m·s-1). RT programs had selective effects on the strength variables
being FW more effective in increasing 1-repetition maximum, while EB in increasing maximal isometric
force. Very large correlations were observed between two-point (L-V relationship modelled through two
pairs of L and V data) and multiple-point methods (L-V relationship modelled through six pairs of L and
V data) (V0: r=0.96; HTV: r=0.93). All coefficients of variation showed high validity both for V0 and HTV
(≤6.2%). Altogether, FW training should be used for increasing the velocity of the throwing performance,
while the two-point method for following training-induced changes