Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNur Usta, Sila
dc.contributor.authorSolana, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Linares, Matilde
dc.contributor.authorBaca García, María Pilar 
dc.contributor.authorFerrer-Luque, Carmen María 
dc.contributor.authorCabeo, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorArias Moliz, María Teresa 
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T09:43:28Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08T09:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-03
dc.identifier.citationSıla Nur Usta et al. Clinical Oral Investigations. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04929-z]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/81383
dc.descriptionThe authors acknowledge Francisca Castillo Pérez for her technical assistancees_ES
dc.descriptionEthical approval. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the university where the study was conducted (no. 1076 CEIH/2020).es_ES
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The impact of conservative instrumentation on the disinfection of root canals with different curvatures has not yet been determined. This ex vivo study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of conservative instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) and Rotate and a conventional rotary system, ProTaper Gold (PTG), on root canal disinfection during chemomechanical preparation of straight and curved canals. Materials and methods: Ninety mandibular molars with straight (n = 45) and curved (n = 45) mesiobuccal root canals were contaminated with polymicrobial clinical samples. Teeth were divided into three subgroups (n = 14) according to the file systems and the curvature. Canals were instrumented with TN, Rotate, and PTG, respectively. Sodium hypochlorite and EDTA were used as irrigants. Intracanal samples were taken before (S1) and after (S2) instrumentation. Six uninfected teeth were used as negative controls. The bacterial reduction between S1 and S2 was measured by ATP assay, flow cytometry, and culture methods. Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests were followed by the Duncan post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: Bacterial reduction percentages were similar for the three file systems in straight canals (p > 0.05). However, PTG showed a lower reduction percentage of intact membrane cells in flow cytometry than TN and Rotate (p = 0.036). For the curved canals, no significant differences were obtained (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Conservative instrumentation of straight and curved canals using TN and Rotate files resulted in similar bacterial reduction compared to PTG. Clinical relevance: The disinfection efficacy of conservative instrumentation is similar to conventional instrumentation in straight and curved root canals.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Granada/CBUA.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Group CTS‑167 of the Junta de Andalucía, Spain.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectConservative instrumentationes_ES
dc.subjectDisinfectiones_ES
dc.subjectPolymicrobial infectiones_ES
dc.subjectRoot canal preparationes_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of conservative instrumentation in root canal disinfectiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-023-04929-z
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution 4.0 Internacional