Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorUbago Guisado, Esther 
dc.contributor.authorMoratalla Aranda, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Salvatierra, Sheila
dc.contributor.authorGil Cosano, José Juan 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Fontana, Beatriz 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Fontana, Cristina 
dc.contributor.authorGracia Marco, Luis Andrés 
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Torres, Manuel Eduardo 
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T13:19:28Z
dc.date.available2023-03-03T13:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-09
dc.identifier.citationUbago-Guisado E... [et al.] (2023) Do patients with type 2 diabetes have impaired hip bone microstructure? A study using 3D modeling of hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Front. Endocrinol. 13:1069224. doi: [10.3389/fendo.2022.1069224]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/80379
dc.description.abstractAim: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have more risk of bone fractures. However, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by conventional dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DXA) is not useful for identifying this risk. This study aims to evaluate 3D-DXA parameters determining the cortical and trabecular compartments in patients with T2DM compared to non-diabetic subjects and to identify their determinants. Materials and methods: Case-control study in 111 T2DM patients (65.4 ± 7.6 years old) and 134 non-diabetic controls (64.7 ± 8.6-year-old). DXA, 3D-DXA modelling via 3D-Shaper software and trabecular bone score (TBS) were used to obtain aBMD, cortical and trabecular parameters, and lumbar spine microarchitecture, respectively. In addition, biochemical markers as 25- hydroxyvitamin d, type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), Cterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were analysed. Results: Mean-adjusted values showed higher aBMD (5.4%-7.7%, ES: 0.33- 0.53) and 3D-DXA parameters (4.1%-10.3%, ES: 0.42-0.68) in the T2DM group compared with the control group. However, TBS was lower in the T2DM group compared to the control group (-14.7%, ES: 1.18). In addition, sex (b = 0.272 to 0.316) and body mass index (BMI) (b = 0.236 to 0.455) were the most consistent and positive predictors of aBMD (p ≤ 0.01). BMI and P1NP were negative predictors of TBS (b = -0.530 and -0.254, respectively, p ≤ 0.01), while CTX was a positive one (b = 0.226, p=0.02). Finally, BMI was consistently the strongest positive predictor of 3D-DXA parameters (b = 0.240 to 0.442, p<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with T2DM present higher bone mass measured both by conventional DXA and 3D-DXA, suggesting that 3D-DXA technology is not capable of identifying alterations in bone structure in this population. Moreover, BMI was the most consistent determinant in all bone outcomes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III grants (PI18–00803, PI21–01069, and PI18–01235)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Regional Development Fund (FEDER) Junta de Andalucı́a grant (PI-0268–2019)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPrograma Operativo Fondo Social Europeo (FSE) de Andalucı́a (2014–2020) DOC_01618es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III (CD20/00022)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontierses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes mellituses_ES
dc.subject3D-DXAes_ES
dc.subjectBone modellinges_ES
dc.subjectBone remodeling es_ES
dc.subjectBone QCT/microCTes_ES
dc.titleDo patients with type 2 diabetes have impaired hip bone microstructure? A study using 3D modeling of hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fendo.2022.1069224
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional