A concurrent prenatal exercise program increases neonatal and placental weight and shortens labor: The GESTAFIT project
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Baena García, Laura; De la Flor Alemany, Marta; Coll Risco, Irene; Aranda Ramírez, Pilar; Aparicio García-Molina, VirginiaEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Aerobic exercise Cesarean section Parturition Strength training
Fecha
2022-12-28Referencia bibliográfica
Baena-García, L... [et al.]. A concurrent prenatal exercise program increases neonatal and placental weight and shortens labor: The GESTAFIT project. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023; 00: 1- 10. doi:[10.1111/sms.14298]
Patrocinador
European Regional Development Funds; Junta de Andalucía; Research and Knowledge Transfer Fund; UCEESResumen
Objective
To explore the influence of a supervised concurrent exercise-training program during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal birth-related outcomes and type of birth.
Methods
One hundred and fifty-nine Caucasian pregnant women from the GESTAFIT project participated in this quasi-experimental study and were allocated into control [(n = 86), (age 33.1 ± 4.8 years old, BMI 24.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2)] or exercise group [(n = 50) (age 33.1 ± 4.1 years old, BMI: 24.7 ± 4.1 kg/m2)]. The exercise group followed a 60-min 3 days/week concurrent (aerobic and strength) training program from the 17th gestational week until birth. Maternal and neonatal birth-related outcomes (i.e., gestational age at birth, duration of labor, placental and neonatal weight and type of birth) were collected from obstetric medical records. Umbilical arterial and venous blood gas analysis were assessed after birth.
Results
The exercise group increased average duration of the first stage of labor [between-group differences (B): 80.8 min, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.18, 157.31, p = 0.03] and decreased duration of the second stage of labor [between-group differences (B): 29.8 min, 95% CI: −55.5, −4.17, p = 0.02] compared to the control group. The exercise group showed greater placental [between-group differences (B): 53.3 g (95% CI: 9.99, 96.7, p = 0.01)] and neonatal [between-group differences (B): 161.8 g (95% CI: 9.81, 313.8, p = 0.033)] weight compared to the control group. No differences between groups were found regarding type of birth (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
A concurrent and supervised physical exercise program during pregnancy is safe and could promote better maternal and neonatal birth-related outcomes. More studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms by which physical exercise increases neonatal and placenta weight.