Cultural influence on the expression of labour‑associated pain
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Navarro Prado, Silvia; Sanchez Ojeda, Maria Angustias; Marmolejo Martín, Juan Antonio; Kapravelou, Garyfallia; Fernández Gómez, Elisabet; Martín Salvador, AdelinaEditorial
BMC
Materia
Labour pain Culture Communication barriers Midwife care Support
Fecha
2022-11-14Referencia bibliográfica
Navarro-Prado, S... [et al.]. Cultural influence on the expression of labour-associated pain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 836 (2022). [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05173-1]
Resumen
Background: Every woman expresses pain differently during birth since it depends on a multitude of predictive
factors. The medical care received, companionship during birth, cultural background and language barriers of the
women in labour can influence on the expression of pain. This study aims to evaluate the expression of pain during
birth and its associated factors in women treated in a Spanish border town.
Methods: The study included 246 women in labour. The expression of pain during labour was evaluated using the
validated ESVADOPA scale. A descriptive analysis and association study were performed between cultural identity and
dimensions of the scale. Multiple linear regression models were performed to assess the association between cultural
identity, origin, language barrier, and companionship during labour.
Results: The women included in the study comprised 68.7% Berbers, 71.5% Muslims and 82.1% were accompanied
during labour. An association between cultural identity and greater body expression of pain (p = 0.020; Cramer’s
V = 0.163) in addition to its verbal expression was found during the latent phase of labour, (p = 0.028; Cramer’s
V = 0.159). During the active phase of labour, cultural identity was associated with pain expression through greater
body response, verbal expression, expression of the facial muscles, anxiety, inability to relax and vegetative symptoms.
The different factors studied that had a predictive value were companionship (p = 0.027) during the latent
phase of labour and Berber origin (p = 0.000), language barrier (p = 0.014) and companionship (p = 0.005) during
the active phase of labour. The models designed predict pain expression in the latent phase by companionship
and type of companionship (β = 1.483; 95%CI = 0.459–2.506, β = 0.238; 95%CI = 0.029–0. 448, respectively), and in
the active phase by background, language barrier and companionship (β = 0.728; 95%CI = 0.258–1.198, β = 0.738;
95%CI = 0.150–1.326, β = 1.888; 95%CI = 0.984–2.791, respectively).
Conclusion: Culture, origin, language barrier and companionship during labour influences the manner in which
women in labour express their pain. An understanding of this may help midwives correctly interpret the signs of pain
expression and be able to offer the appropriate assistance depending on a woman’s particular characteristics. There
is a clear need for new models of maternity care that will take the cultural and language characteristics of women in
labour into consideration.