Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTimbrell, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorDe la Peña Alonso, Paloma 
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T13:38:47Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T13:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-27
dc.identifier.citationLucy Timbrell... [et al.]. Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, Quaternary Science Reviews, Volume 297, 2022, 107813, ISSN 0277-3791, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/78214
dc.description.abstractLithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post- Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other wellknown phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Research & Innovation (UKRI)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipArts & Humanities Research Council (AHRC) NGS-54810R-19es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWenner Gren Foundation CEOOP2020-1es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPoroulis grant through Cambridge Universityes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish FEDER/Ministry of Science and Innovation 262618es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Geographic Explorer grant ANR-10-LABX-52es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDSI- NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences grant 191022_001es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding schemees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLaScArBx research programmees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipGrand Programme de Recherche 'Human Past' of the Initiative d'Excellence (IdEx) of the Bordeaux Universityes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLeakey Foundation (Movement, interaction, and structure: modelling population networks and cultural diversity in the African Middle Stone Age)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLithic Studies Society (Jacobi Bursary Awardee, 2020)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTalents Programme AH/R012792/1 Gr. 10157 PID2019-1049449 GB-I00es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectMiddle stone agees_ES
dc.subjectLithic technologyes_ES
dc.subjectOutline-based geometric morphometricses_ES
dc.subjectChaîne opératoirees_ES
dc.subjectStone toolses_ES
dc.titleTechnological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post- Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africaes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional