Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorSardjoe Mishre, Aashley S. D.
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Gutiérrez, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T08:46:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T08:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-02
dc.identifier.citationSardjoe Mishre, A.S.D... [et al.]. The Infrared Thermography Toolbox: An Open-access Semi-automated Segmentation Tool for Extracting Skin Temperatures in the Thoracic Region including Supraclavicular Brown Adipose Tissue. J Med Syst 46, 89 (2022). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01871-7]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/78202
dc.description.abstractInfrared thermography (IRT) is widely used to assess skin temperature in response to physiological changes. Yet, it remains challenging to standardize skin temperature measurements over repeated datasets. We developed an open-access semi-automated segmentation tool (the IRT-toolbox) for measuring skin temperatures in the thoracic area to estimate supraclavicular brown adipose tissue (scBAT) activity, and compared it to manual segmentations. The IRT-toolbox, designed in Python, consisted of image pre-alignment and non-rigid image registration. The toolbox was tested using datasets of 10 individuals (BMI = 22.1 ± 2.1 kg/m2, age = 22.0 ± 3.7 years) who underwent two cooling procedures, yielding four images per individual. Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated by two raters in the scBAT and deltoid areas on baseline images. The toolbox enabled direct transfer of baseline ROIs to the registered follow-up images. For comparison, both raters also manually drew ROIs in all follow-up images. Spatial ROI overlap between methods and raters was determined using the Dice coefficient. Mean bias and 95% limits of agreement in mean skin temperature between methods and raters were assessed using Bland– Altman analyses. ROI delineation time was four times faster with the IRT-toolbox (01:04 min) than with manual delineations (04:12 min). In both anatomical areas, there was a large variability in ROI placement between methods. Yet, relatively small skin temperature differences were found between methods (scBAT: 0.10 °C, 95%LoA[-0.13 to 0.33 °C] and deltoid: 0.05 °C, 95%LoA[-0.46 to 0.55 °C]). The variability in skin temperature between raters was comparable between methods. The IRT-toolbox enables faster ROI delineations, while maintaining inter-user reliability compared to manual delineations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNetherlands Heart Foundation 2017T016 CVON201402 ENERGISE CVON2017 GENIUS-2es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAlfonso Martin Escuderoes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMaria Zambrano fellowship by the Ministerio de Universidades y la Union Europea -NextGeneration EU RR_C_2021_04es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDutch Society for Diabetes Research (NVDO)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDutch Diabetes Foundation 2015.81.1808es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNetherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiativees_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLUMC profile area 'biomedical imaging'es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectInfrared thermographyes_ES
dc.subjectNon-rigid image registrationes_ES
dc.subjectSemi-automated analysises_ES
dc.subjectBATes_ES
dc.titleThe Infrared Thermography Toolbox: An Open‑access Semi‑automated Segmentation Tool for Extracting Skin Temperatures in the Thoracic Region including Supraclavicular Brown Adipose Tissuees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10916-022-01871-7
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional