| dc.contributor.author | Ducheyne, Steffen | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-26T12:34:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-26T12:34:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ducheyne, Steffen. «Galileo and Huygens on free fall : mathematical and methodological differences». Dynamis: Acta Hispanica ad Medicinae Scientiarumque Historiam Illustrandam, 2008, Vol. 28, p. 243-274, https://raco.cat/index.php/Dynamis/article/view/118814. | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0211-9536 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10481/77577 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this essay, I will scrutinize the differences between Galileo’s and Huygens’s demonstrations
of free fall, which can be found respectively in the Discorsi and the Horologium,
from a mathematical, representational and methodological perspective. I argue that more can
be learnt from such an analysis than the thesis that Huygens re-styled Galilean mechanics which
is a communis opinio. I shall argue that the differences in their approach on free fall highlight
a significantly different mathematical and methodological outlook. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Granada | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Huygens | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Galileo | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Caída libre | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Mecánica | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Filosofía natural del siglo XVII | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Horologium Oscillatorium | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Discorsi | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Free fall | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Mechanics | es_ES |
| dc.subject | XVIIth century natural philosophy | es_ES |
| dc.title | Galileo and Huygens on free fall: Mathematical and methodological differences | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |