Immunological and inflammatory changes after simplifying to dual therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients through week 96 in a randomized trial
Metadata
Show full item recordEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Dual therapy HIV reservoir HIV treatment Immune activation and inflammation Immune recovery Simplification strategy Triple therapy
Date
2022-03-11Referencia bibliográfica
María Trujillo-Rodríguez... [et al.]. Immunological and inflammatory changes after simplifying to dual therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients through week 96 in a randomized trial, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 28, Issue 8, 2022, Pages 1151.e9-1151.e16, ISSN 1198-743X, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.041]
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate whether simplification of antiretroviral treatment to dual therapy (DT) negatively
impacts immune recovery (IR), immune activation and inflammation (IA/I), and HIV reservoir.
Methods: An open-label, single-centre, randomized controlled trial conducted in adult virologically
suppressed HIV-infected patients on triple therapy (TT) with elvitegravir-cobicistat, emtricitabine and
tenofovir alafenamide or dolutegravir (DTG), abacavir, and lamivudine (3TC). Participants were randomized
to continue TT or switch to DTG, or darunavir/cobicistat (DRVc) plus 3TC. IR was assessed by
CD4þ/CD8þ ratio at 48 and 96 weeks. Changes in immune activation, proliferation, exhaustion, senescence,
and apoptosis in CD4þ and CD8þ T cells, plasma sCD14, hsCRP, D-dimers, b2-microglobulin, IL-6,
TNF-a and IP-10 levels, cell-associated HIV-DNA (CA-DNA), and unspliced HIV-RNA (usRNA) were also
analysed.
Results: One hundred and fifty-one participants were enrolled. Fourteen patients did not complete the
follow up. In the ITT and PP analysis, the IR was similar between the treatment arms. In the ITT analysis,
the median increase in CD4þ/CD8þ ratio was 0.10, 0.04, and 0.07 at week 48, and 0.09, 0.05, and 0.08 at
week 96 for TT, DTG/3TC, and DRVc/3TC, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the slopes
of changes in CD4þ/CD8þ ratio over time were independent of treatment (F ¼ 1.699; p ¼ 0.436) and
related only to baseline values (F ¼ 756.871; p ¼ 0.000). There were no differences in IA/I, CA-DNA, or
usRNA between treatment arms.
Discussion: Both IR and IA/I, CA-DNA, and usRNA were similar in the three treatment groups, regardless
of maintaining TT or simplifying to DTG/3TC or DRVc/3TC in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients.