Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Chongsheng
dc.contributor.authorGarcía López, Salvador 
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-12T11:10:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-12T11:10:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-13
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Zhang, C... [et al.]. An empirical study on the joint impact of feature selection and data resampling on imbalance classification. Appl Intell (2022). [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03772-1]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/76651
dc.description.abstractIn predictive tasks, real-world datasets often present di erent degrees of imbalanced (i.e., long-tailed or skewed) distributions. While the majority (the head or the most frequent) classes have su cient samples, the minority (the tail or the less frequent or rare) classes can be under-represented by a rather limited number of samples. Data pre-processing has been shown to be very e ective in dealing with such problems. On one hand, data re-sampling is a common approach to tackling class imbalance. On the other hand, dimension reduction, which reduces the feature space, is a conventional technique for reducing noise and inconsistencies in a dataset. However, the possible synergy between feature selection and data re-sampling for high-performance imbalance classification has rarely been investigated before. To address this issue, we carry out a comprehensive empirical study on the joint influence of feature selection and re-sampling on two-class imbalance classification. Specifically, we study the performance of two opposite pipelines for imbalance classification by applying feature selection before or after data re-sampling. We conduct a large number of experiments, with a total of 9225 tests, on 52 publicly available datasets, using 9 feature selection methods, 6 resampling approaches for class imbalance learning, and 3 well-known classification algorithms. Experimental results show that there is no constant winner between the two pipelines; thus both of them should be considered to derive the best performing model for imbalance classification. We find that the performance of an imbalance classification model not only depends on the classifier adopted and the ratio between the number of majority and minority samples, but also depends on the ratio between the number of samples and features. Overall, this study should provide new reference value for researchers and practitioners in imbalance learning.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTIN2017-89517-Pes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectClass imbalance learninges_ES
dc.subjectFeature selectiones_ES
dc.subjectData selectiones_ES
dc.subjectRe-samplinges_ES
dc.titleAn Empirical Study on the Joint Impact of Feature Selection and Data Re-sampling on Imbalance Classificationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.type.hasVersionSMURes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional