Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Improving Healthy Diet and/or Physical Activity during Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor
Kouiti, Malak; Hernández-Muñiz, Cristian; Youlyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam; Salcedo Bellido, Inmaculada; Mozas Moreno, Juan; Jiménez Moleón, José JuanEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Gestational diabetes mellitus Dietary intervention Physical activity intervention Randomized controlled clinical trials Experimental studies Systematic review Meta-analysis
Date
2022-05-14Referencia bibliográfica
Kouiti, M.; Hernández-Muñiz, C.; Youlyouz-Marfak, I.; Salcedo-Bellido, I.; Mozas-Moreno, J.; Jiménez-Moleón, J.J. Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Improving Healthy Diet and/or Physical Activity during Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2066. [https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14102066]
Abstract
Several epidemiological studies have analyzed the effects of lifestyle modification on
reducing the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); however, their results remain inconsistent.
This umbrella review aims to evaluate the effects of diet and/or physical activity interventions
during pregnancy on preventing GDM. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized clinical
trials reporting preventive effects of diet and/or physical activity in reducing the incidence of
GDM were included from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane library. Two authors
independently assessed the overlapping and quality of the 35 selected reviews using AMSTAR
2. The results, although variable, tend to defend the protective role of diet and physical activity
interventions separately and independently of each other in the prevention of GDM. However, the
results for the combined interventions show a possible protective effect; however, it is not entirely
clear because most of the analyzed meta-analyses tend to approach 1, and heterogeneity cannot be
ruled out. Establishing conclusions about the most efficient type of intervention and a dose–effect
relationship was not feasible given the low quality of systematic reviews (83% low to critically
low) and the variability in reporting interventions. Therefore, more studies with better quality and
definition of the interventions are required. The protocol was previously registered in PROSPERO as
CRD42021237895.