Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDe la Hoz Torres, María Luisa 
dc.contributor.authorAguilar Aguilera, Antonio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Padillo, Diego Pablo 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Aires, María Dolores 
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T09:58:40Z
dc.date.available2022-06-01T09:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-25
dc.identifier.citationde la Hoz-Torres, M.L... [et al.]. Whole Body Vibration Exposure Transmitted to Drivers of Heavy Equipment Vehicles: A Comparative Case According to the Short- and Long-Term Exposure Assessment Methodologies Defined in ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5206. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095206]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/75161
dc.descriptionThis research was funded by the Consejo General de la Arquitectura Tecnica (CGATE), Junta de Andalucia and European Regional Development Funds under project B-TEP-362-UGR18, and the State Research Agency (SRA) of Spain and European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) under project PID2019-108761RB-I00.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe construction and transport sectors are the industries with the highest proportions of workers exposed to vibrations in the European Union. Heavy equipment vehicle (HEV) drivers often perform operations on different uneven surfaces and are exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) on a daily basis. Recently, a new version of ISO 2631-5 was published. However, since this new method required as input the individual exposure profile and the acceleration signals recorded on more surfaces, limited studies have been carried out to evaluate HEV operations according to this standard. The objectives of this study were to assess the WBV exposure using the methods defined in ISO 2631-1:1997 and ISO 2631-5:2018 and to compare the obtained health risk assessments between drivers with different anthropometric characteristics. For this purpose, two drivers were selected and a field measurement campaign was conducted. Regarding short-term assessment, results showed that VDV was the most restrictive method with exposure levels above the exposure action limit value, while SAd indicated that the same exposures were safe for the worker. With respect to long-term assessment, Risk Factor RA showed that the driver with the highest body mass index was the only one who exceeded the low probability limit of adverse health effects.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipConsejo General de la Arquitectura Tecnica (CGATE), Junta de Andaluciaes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission B-TEP-362-UGR18es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipState Research Agency (SRA) of Spaines_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission PID2019-108761RB-I00es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectWhole-body vibrationes_ES
dc.subjectISO2631-1:1997es_ES
dc.subjectISO2631-5:2018es_ES
dc.subjectHeavy equipment vehicleses_ES
dc.titleWhole Body Vibration Exposure Transmitted to Drivers of Heavy Equipment Vehicles: A Comparative Case According to the Short- and Long-Term Exposure Assessment Methodologies Defined in ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph19095206
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 3.0 España