Sociolinguistic context matters: Exploring differences in contextual linguistic diversity in South Africa and England
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Taylor & Francis
Materia
CILD-Q CLiP-Q Codeswitching Contextual linguistic diversity Lingualism status Socioeconomic status
Fecha
2022-05-04Referencia bibliográfica
Mandy Wigdorowitz, Ana I. Pérez & Ianthi M. Tsimpli (2022): Sociolinguistic context matters: Exploring differences in contextual linguistic diversity in South Africa and England, International Multilingual Research Journal, DOI: [10.1080/19313152.2022.2069416]
Patrocinador
Commonwealth Scholarship Commission and Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust; MSCA-COFUND Athenea 3i-2018 grant 754446Resumen
Individual reports of language history, use, and proficiency are generally
considered sufficient for language profiling. Yet, these variables alone
neglect the contribution of contextual linguistic diversity to one’s overall
language repertoire. In this study we used the Contextual Linguistic Profile
Questionnaire to evaluate whether there is a difference in contextual linguistic
diversity between participants across the linguistically dissimilar
contexts of South Africa and England. We further assessed whether selfreported
lingualism status groups (monolinguals, bilinguals, multilinguals)
scored differently on contextual linguistic diversity to evaluate the utility
and uniformity of categorical labels across varying contexts, and investigated
how codeswitching and socio-economic status contributed to these
effects. Our results demonstrated that contextual linguistic diversity differs
between nations: South Africans score higher, promotion of multilingualism
is dependent on socio-economic status only in England, lingualism status is
not contextually comparable when measured categorically, and codeswitching
accounts for linguistic features of South Africans.